London (England) -- Description and travel; London (England) -- History -- 16th century -- Sources; London (England) -- Surveys
The Britons after this, continuing a lingering and doubtful war with
the Scots and Picts, made choice of Vortigern to be their king and
leader, which man (as saith Malmesbury[13]) was neither valorous of
courage, nor wise of counsel, but wholly given over to the unlawful
lusts of his flesh; the people likewise, in short time, being grown
to some quietness, gave themselves to gluttony and drunkenness, pride,
contention, envy, and such other vices, casting from them the yoke of
Christ. In the mean season, a bitter plague fell among them, consuming
in short time such a multitude that the quick were not sufficient to
bury the dead; and yet the remnant remained so hardened in sin, that
neither death of their friends, nor fear of their own danger, could cure
the mortality of their souls, whereupon a greater stroke of vengeance
ensued upon the whole sinful nation. For being now again infested with
their old neighbours the Scots and Picts, they consult with their king
Vortigern,[14] and send for the Saxons, who shortly after arrived here
in Britain, where, saith Bede, they were received as friends; but as it
proved, they minded to destroy the country as enemies; for after that
they had driven out the Scots and Picts, they also drove the Britons,
some over the seas, some into the waste mountains of Wales and Cornwall,
and divided the country into divers kingdoms amongst themselves.
These Saxons were likewise ignorant of building with stone until the
year 680; for then it is affirmed that Benet, abbot of Wirrall,[15]
master to the reverend Bede, first brought artificers of stone houses
and glass windows into this island amongst the Saxons, arts before that
time unto them unknown, and therefore used they but wooden buildings.
And to this accordeth Policronicon, who says, “that then had ye wooden
churches, nay wooden chalices and golden priests, but since golden
chalices and wooden priests.” And to knit up this argument, King Edgar
in his charter to the abbey of Malmesbury, dated the year of Christ 974,
hath words to this effect: “All the monasteries in my realm, to the
outward sight, are nothing but worm-eaten and rotten timber and boards,
and that worse is, within they are almost empty, and void of Divine
service.”
Thus much be said for walling, not only in respect of this city, but
generally also of the first within the realm. Now to return to our
Trinobant (as Cæsar hath it), the same is since by Tacitus, Ptolemæus,
and Antoninus, called Londinium, Longidinum; of Ammiamus, Lundinum,
and Augusta, who calleth it an ancient city; of our Britons, Lundayne;
of the old Saxons, Lundenceaster, Lundenbrig, Londennir; of strangers
Londra and Londres; of the inhabitants, London; whereof you may read a
more large and learned discourse, and how it took the name, in that
work of my loving friend, Master Camden, now Clarencieux, which is
called _Britannia_.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account