The Swedes on the Delaware, 1638-1664Johnson, Amandus
History
The Swedes on the Delaware, 1638-1664
Johnson, Amandus
Delaware River Valley (N.Y.-Del. and N.J.) -- History; New Sweden -- History; Swedes -- United States
English to pay duty or recognition on the goods they had sold to the
Swedes for four years” past.
[Illustration: Copy of the testimony of the heirs of
Mitatsimint, July 3, 1651. Translated in the author’s
_Swedish Settlements_, II, 757.]
When the directors of the Dutch West India Company heard of
Stuyvesant’s expedition, they were greatly surprised, and expressed
concern about the consequences. “God grant,” they wrote, “that what
your Honor has done may turn out for the best. We cannot express our
opinion of it, before we have ... heard how the complaints of the
Swedish governor will be received by the Queen.” The directors had made
some overtures about fixing the boundaries on the South River by a
treaty with Sweden, but no definite action seems to have been taken.
VI.
The Dutch were now masters on the Delaware. The two warships
undoubtedly returned to New Amsterdam before the winter set in; but
Printz had not a sufficient force to regain what the Dutch had taken
and his instruction cautioned him to begin no hostility. He made the
best of the situation, however, concentrated his forces, and awaited
new arrivals from Sweden. Fort New Elfsborg was abandoned and left
to decay, as it was no longer the key to the river. The garrisons of
Mölndal and New Korsholm were also withdrawn. The Indians fell off from
the Swedes on account of the activities of Stuyvesant. The beaver trade
was monopolized by the Dutch, and the trade with foreign merchants
was poor. The settlers were dissatisfied, and there were few on whom
Printz could depend in an emergency. “For three years and nine months”
the governor had had “absolutely no orders nor assistance” from the
mother country, and he was becoming nervous about the situation. On
the first of August he made reports, imploring the government and the
company to send new cargoes by the following spring. But the spring of
1652 passed, bringing neither ship nor succor from Europe.
Printz, however, made use of every means at his command. The carpenters
were kept busy, mending the forts and building boats, when they were
not employed in the erection of houses. A sloop had been built at the
wharf of Christina for which sails were brought over on the _Swan_
in 1648. It was used by Printz on official business, and the expenses
connected with its construction and rigging out were charged to the
admiralty. The governor had requested the company to station a vessel
in the river, which could be used for various purposes; but his letters
were not even answered. Consequently he determined to build a ship
himself and in August, 1652, he wrote that “the ship was ready on
the river except for sails, tackle, cannon and crew, that were too
expensive to hire and buy here.” The vessel was of about 200 tons
burden, a large boat for that time, and it seems that Printz intended
to use her in defending the river, as well as for preying on Spanish
commerce.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account