The Symbolism of Churches and Church Ornaments: A Translation of the First Book of the Rationale Divinorum OfficiorumDurand, Guillaume
Religion
The Symbolism of Churches and Church Ornaments: A Translation of the First Book of the Rationale Divinorum Officiorum
Durand, Guillaume
Christian art and symbolism; Church architecture
[Footnote 331: Perhaps this custom was introduced by the Crusaders.
'As the ostrich is good for food, so, it seems, are its eggs: to say
nothing of their being objects of attention, as being used much in
the East by way of ornament; for they are hung up in their places of
public worship, along with many lamps.' Harmer's 'Observations,'
vol. iv, p. 336, who refers to Pococke's 'Travels,' vol. i, p. 31,
and imagines that Dr. Chandler, in his travels in Asia Minor, was
mistaken when he supposed that the Turkish Mosque of Magnesia was
ornamented with lamps pendent from the ceiling intermixed with balls
of polished ivory, p. 267. Ostrich eggs might easily be mistaken for
ivory balls. The following passage from De Moleon is curious: 'At
the conclusion of matins,' he says, speaking of the rites of S.
Maurice at Angers on Easter Day, 'two chaplains take their place
behind the altar curtains. Two corbeliers (_Cubiculares_) in
dalmatics, amices, and _mitellae_, with gloves on their hands,
present themselves before the altar. The chaplains chant. _Quem
quaeritis_? The corbeliers representing the Maries, reply, Jesum
_Nazarenum Crucifixum._ The others answer, _Resurrexit, non est
hic_. The corbeliers take from the altar _two_ ostrich eggs wrapped
in silk, and go forth, chanting, _Alleluia resurrexit_ Dominus,
_resurrexit Leo Fortis_, Christus, _Filius_ Dei.'--_Voyag. Lit._ p.
98. ]
[Footnote 332: S. Luke xxii, 61.]
{68}
44. Now in the Primitive Church, the sacrifice was offered in vessels
of wood, and common vests: for then were 'chalices of wood, and
priests of gold': whereof the contrary is now. But Severinus, Pope,
decreed that it should be offered in glass: [Footnote 333] but
because such vessels were easily broken, therefore, Urban, Pope, and
the Council [Footnote 334] of Rheims decreed that gold or silver
vessels should be used: or on account of poverty, tin, which rusteth
not: but not in wood nor in brass. Therefore it might not be in glass
on account of the danger of effusion: nor of wood since being porous
and spongy, it absorbeth the blood: nor of brass nor of bronze, the
rust of which is unseemly.
[Footnote 333: See Martene, Tom. IV, ii, 9; the _Ducretum_, fol.
395.]
[Footnote 334: 'A.D. 874, Vid. Concil. Coll. Reg. Tom. I. p. 288.'
See also P. Tunoc. iv, Ep. ad Otton. Carel. xiii _Hardouin_ vii,
365.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account