"The System," As Uncovered by the San Francisco Graft ProsecutionHichborn, Franklin
History
"The System," As Uncovered by the San Francisco Graft Prosecution
Hichborn, Franklin
Political corruption -- California -- San Francisco; San Francisco (Calif.) -- Politics and government
FOOTNOTES:
[118] See Transcript on Appeal The People of the State of California
vs. Eugene E. Schmitz, pp. 500 and 557.
[119] Ruef stated that he appeared as attorney for the French
Restaurant Keepers' Association. But those who paid him the
money for his efforts in this instance testified at the trial
of The People vs. Eugene E. Schmitz that they held membership
in no such organization, nor had they heard of it. In May,
1907, Ruef stated to Heney that he had closed the bargain with
the French-restaurant keepers to represent them on JANUARY 6,
1905. He insisted that he had at first flatly refused to
represent them; that he had had no intention whatever of so
doing until the San Francisco Bulletin denounced him for
having had the licenses held up and challenged him to take the
cases and to attempt to defend himself upon the theory that
the money so obtained by him was received as an attorney's
fee.
Heney examined the Bulletin files and found that the first
time the Bulletin had mentioned the French-restaurant hold-up
as an attempt on the part of Ruef to extort money from the
restaurant proprietors was in the last edition of The Bulletin
for JANUARY 7. 1905. (See Heney's affidavit in the case of The
People vs. Patrick Calhoun, et als., No. 823, pp. 141 to 143,
inclusive.)
[120] Commissioner Harry W. Hutton.
[121] These Ruef-provided rules directed that no liquors be served
in supper bedrooms on the first and second floors of the
establishments, and required the French restaurants to take
out hotel licenses and to keep registers the same as hotels.
What the keepers of the places thought of the regulations came
out at the Schmitz trial. Joe Malfanti of Delmonico's, for
example, testified: "They (the Ruef rules) made no change in
the running of my business--not a single change. I had a hotel
license for years before and I always had a register, so there
was no change in my place whatever."
[122] The Andrews Grand Jury, named from its foreman, T. P. Andrews.
The work of the Andrews Grand Jury was not lost, however. It
served as basis for much of the investigation conducted by the
Oliver Grand Jury.
[123] Rosenthal testified at the Schmitz trial: "I told them from my
observations and how things were going in the city and had
been going for some years, that there was only one man who
could help them--it was a question of life and death with
them--and I said there is only one man who could help you, and
that is Mr. Ruef."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account