"The System," As Uncovered by the San Francisco Graft ProsecutionHichborn, Franklin
History
"The System," As Uncovered by the San Francisco Graft Prosecution
Hichborn, Franklin
Political corruption -- California -- San Francisco; San Francisco (Calif.) -- Politics and government
Rosenthal, when examined on this point before the Grand Jury,
refused to testify on the ground that conversation between
attorney and client was privileged. Adler got into trouble
with the Grand Jury over his testimony on this point. Both
Rosenthal and Adler, however, testified at Schmitz's trial.
[124] N. M. Adler, proprietor of the Bay State Restaurant, testified
at the Schmitz trial as to Loupy's negotiations. Loupy called
upon him twice. "The first time he came," Adler testified, "he
told me that things were very serious, and we would have to
put up some money and hire Mr. Ruef; that he was the only man
that could help us. I told him that I could not understand the
proposition; that I had run my business for twenty years, and
didn't think that they could do me any harm. At that time Ruef
was making his headquarters at the Pup restaurant. I could see
that from my place across the street. He went there
regularly."
Then Adler testified to the meeting before the Police
Commissioners at which his attorney, Rosenthal, had not been
permitted to speak, and continued: "Afterwards, Loupy came to
me again, and told me that Tortoni had closed up, and that we
should put up the money or we would be all closed. This was
after we had been to the meeting of the Police Commissioners."
[125] The testimony brought out at the graft trials showed that Ruef
received $8500 from the French restaurants, $5000 the first
year from the five in the combine; $3000 the second, and $500
additional from Camille Mailhebeau. Ruef stated to Heney later
and so testified at the Schmitz trial, that half of the $8000
received from the combine he turned over to Schmitz.
[126] The five restaurant keepers were asked at the Schmitz trial
whether they had employed Ruef because he was a lawyer or
because of his recognized power as political boss. They
testified as follows:
A. B. Blanco of the "New Poodle Dog"--"Well, being a political
boss we thought he had influence enough to get our licenses."
N. M. Adler, of the "Bay State"--"Well, the way I took it, Mr.
Ruef is a boss. He had an influence over the commission. He
was the only man who could help us." On cross-examination: "I
understood that if I did not employ Ruef I would not get my
license. I understood that Mr. Ruef was the only man who could
get my license."
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account