The Tale of the Great MutinyFitchett, W. H. (William Henry)
History
The Tale of the Great Mutiny
Fitchett, W. H. (William Henry)
India -- History -- Sepoy Rebellion, 1857-1858
Lawrence’s genius and masterful will, too, determined the whole strategy
to be employed for the suppression of the Mutiny. He settled the question
that Delhi must be instantly besieged. He formed a military base for the
siege at Umballa, a distance of a hundred miles, and he kept sleepless
guard over that long line of communications. He fed the besieging force
with supplies and munitions of every kind; reinforced it with, first, his
own frontier troops, the famous Guides and the Ghoorkas, and, later, with
his own movable column. He cast into the scale against Delhi, in effect,
his last coin, his last cartridge, and his last man. And in that terrible
game, on which hung the fate of the British rule in India, Lawrence won!
“Through him,” wrote Lord Canning, “Delhi fell.” And the fall of Delhi
rang the knell of the Mutiny.
[Illustration: MAJOR-GENERAL SIR HERBERT B. EDWARDES, K.C.B., K.C.S.I.
_From a lithograph_]
Once, it is true, even John Lawrence’s iron courage seemed to give way,
or, rather, the strain of the peril threw his cool judgment off its
balance. The fate of India visibly hung on Delhi. The force on the Ridge
was absurdly inadequate for its task, and Lawrence conceived the idea
that, to succeed at Delhi, it would be necessary to abandon Peshawur,
give up the Punjaub to Dost Mohammed, and retire across the Indus. There
were three European regiments, with powerful artillery, and the best
native troops locked up beyond the Indus. On the Ridge at Delhi they
would decide the issue of the siege. “If Delhi does not fall,” Lawrence
argued, “Peshawur must go. Let us abandon the Punjaub for the sake of
Delhi.”
It is still thrilling to read the sentences in which Herbert Edwardes
protested against this evil policy. To abandon Peshawur, he urged, would
be to fail not only at Delhi, but all over India. “Cabul would come
again!” Lawrence quoted Napoleon against Edwardes. Did not Napoleon
ruin himself in 1814 by holding fast to the line of the Elbe instead of
falling back to the Rhine? But Edwardes knew the Eastern mind. India is
not Europe. To waver, to seem to withdraw, to consent to disaster, was
to be ruined. To abandon the Punjaub, Edwardes warned Lawrence, was to
abandon the cause of England in the East. “Every hand in India would be
against us. Don’t yield an inch of frontier!... If General Reed, with
all the men you have sent him, cannot get into Delhi, let Delhi go. The
Empire’s reconquest hangs on the Punjaub.” Then he quotes Nelson against
Lawrence. “Make a stand! ‘Anchor, Hardy, anchor!’” The quotation was,
perhaps, not very relevant; but it is curious to note how one brave
spirit seems to speak to another across half a century, and give a new
edge to its courage.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account