Great Britain. Army. Royal Tank Corps; Tanks (Military science)
A special artillery was told off and divided into two sections. The
first was to provide a few forward silent guns in each divisional
sector. They were to remain hidden till the moment of our attack, and
then to concentrate upon our Tanks. These guns, however, proved apt
to be smothered by our barrage, or not to be able to distinguish their
prey in the half-light of our dawn attacks. Secondly, there were to be
reserve guns whose duty it was to go forward and take up previously
reconnoitred positions after the Tank attack had been launched. It was
generally from these pieces that the Tanks had most to fear. Finally,
all German batteries, including howitzers, had general instructions
to plan their positions in such a way that advancing Tanks would be
subject to a direct fire at about 500 or 600 yards range. In the event
of a Tank attack, the engagement of our machines was now to be the
first call upon the artillery, to the exclusion of counter-battery or
any other work. As for the infantry, the chief rôle allotted to them
was “to keep their heads,” and “to keep calm.” Other Orders instructed
them to move to a flank in the event of a Tank attack. “No advice was
given, however, as to how this was to be done when Tanks were attacking
on a frontage of twenty or thirty miles.”
A large armoury of special anti-Tank weapons arose, and of these the
most important was the anti-Tank rifle, of which we have spoken before.
[82] “The weapon weighed 36 lb. and was 5½ feet long. It had no
magazine and fired single shots, using A.P. ammunition of .530
calibre. It was obviously too conspicuous and too slow a weapon
to be really effective against Tanks, though the steel core could
penetrate the armour of British Tanks at several hundred yards
range.
“The chief disadvantage of the anti-Tank rifle, however, was that
the German soldier would not use it. He was untrained in its use,
afraid of its kick, and still more afraid of the Tanks themselves.
It is doubtful if one per cent. of the A.T. rifles captured in our
Tank attacks had ever been fired.”
Road obstacles, such as carts full of stones, linked up with wire
cables, concrete stockades and mines, provided a good deal of the
rest of the enemy anti-Tank stock-in-trade. Of mines there was a
considerable variety. They ranged from elaborate specially made pieces
of apparatus to high explosive shells, buried and hastily fitted with a
device by which the weight of the Tank exploded them.
They were sometimes buried in lines across roads, and sometimes
extensive minefields were laid. Their singular ineffectiveness always
seemed somewhat mysterious to members of the Tank Corps, the proportion
of effort to result seeming always many tons of mine to each Tank
damaged.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account