Great Britain. Army. Royal Tank Corps; Tanks (Military science)
Any one who has lived in an ordinary camp where there were no secrets
and remembers what rumours flourished on the most ethereal food, can
imagine their growth in a camp where there was a real mystery.
But at last, towards the beginning of June, a limited number of Mark I.
machines were detrained at a special railhead within the area.[7] The
training of the Battalion now began in earnest. Machines and men were
destined to be launched in little over six weeks’ time into the then
newly begun Somme offensive.
Two types of Tank were detrained, “Big Willie” and “Little Willie.”
The Mark I. (Big Willie) was very different from the Mark V. machine
described in Chapter I.
It took four men to drive it. It had an unwieldly two-wheeled tail, or
to give this appendage its official name, a “Hydraulic Stabiliser.” By
this device it could let itself down gently over a drop of over 5 ft.,
and partly with the aid of it, the machine was steered.
In practice, compared with the handy Mark V., the whole steering
arrangement of the Mark I. was extraordinarily clumsy and laborious.
She would not turn sharply at all on rough ground, and had to be coaxed
to any change of direction. Her engine and tracks also needed constant
adjustment, the rollers being an everlasting source of trouble. Drivers
and mechanics who have handled both machines, seem to regard the
running of a Mark V. as child’s-play after struggling with the caprices
of “Mother.”
“Little Willie” was used only as a training Tank, as in practice he was
found to have a defective balance. His centre of gravity was misplaced,
and he was, besides, too short for the work of crossing trenches.
II
But there were other than technical problems awaiting solution.
It would be difficult to over-estimate the difficulties which
confronted those officers who were responsible for the preliminary
training of the Heavy Section of the Machine Gun Corps; no one had
ever actually fought inside a Tank, and it was, therefore, upon the
spirit of prophecy alone that they must rely in their preparations.
There was no manual to help them. They had, however, one very excellent
official document, the secret _Notes on the Employment of Tanks_, which
was issued in February 1916 (signed “E. D. S.”[8]), which gave an
extraordinarily good forecast of what the rôle of Tanks would probably
be when in action.
But the paper was very short and very objective, and was more concerned
with an analysis of the place of the Tanks in the orchestra of battle
than with the difficulties presented by their individual score.
This was where the training of the first Tank crew fell short--almost
inevitably. Their teachers had a rather hazy mental picture of the
actuality of battle. They did not squarely face the essential question
upon whose answer all specific training and all specific preparation
depend, the question, that is, “What is it going to be like?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account