The Tariff in Our TimesTarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
History
The Tariff in Our Times
Tarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
Tariff -- United States -- History
As an illustration of the kind of reconstruction which went on, take the
sugar schedule. It is an illuminating example of tariff-making as
practised by the Senate of the United States, both then and now. We have
seen what the McKinley Bill did for raw sugar,—made it free, but gave
bounties to the home sugar-growers equivalent to two cents a pound. As
for refined sugar, all grades from No. 16, Dutch Standard, upward, were
allowed one-half cent a pound, which was undoubtedly a pure gratuity to
the sugar trust. Formed in 1887, with a capital of $50,000,000, the
stock of this organization had not been listed on the New York stock
exchange until February of 1889. When the McKinley Bill was first
brought into the House in January of 1890, sugar certificates were worth
fifty cents on the dollar. Their rise between that date, when it looked
as if refined sugar would be given no duty, and the date in May, when
the one-half cent was fixed, was told three years later on the witness
stand by a Senator of the United States who was familiar with operations
of this sort, Calvin S. Brice of Ohio:
“During the month of January,” said Mr. Brice, “sugar stock
fluctuated between 50 and 60, with as wide or wider fluctuations in
each of the four following months. So then when the bill had passed
the House of Representatives and had been favorably considered and
settled in the Senate Finance Committee in May, the sugar trust
certificates had advanced to 95, an advance of 45 points or
$22,500,000 computed on the capital of the sugar trust, or
$33,750,000 if the other $25,000,000 which were added a few months
afterwards as representing the Spreckels, Harrison, and Knight
refineries are taken into account. During the fall of 1890 the
Baring panic temporarily depressed sugar trust certificates, as well
as other securities in the New York Stock Exchange, but as soon as
that had gone by, the sugar trust certificates went above par, and
eventually under the operations of the McKinley Act reached 134 or
135; an advance from January, 1890, when the McKinley Bill was
introduced, of 85 points, or $42,500,000 on the sugar trust
certificates, and an advance of $63,750,000 on the American Sugar
Refining Company’s Stock, the Company which in 1891 succeeded the
original trust.”
The dealings in the certificates on the New York Stock Exchange in 1890
Senator Brice declared to have amounted to 8,000,000 shares,
$800,000,000. As for profits, the trust’s president, Mr. H. O.
Havemeyer, said on the witness stand in 1894 that he reckoned them at
close to $25,000,000 for the three years, or, as he put it,
“three-eighths of a cent more on every pound they (the consumers) ate.”
Without the McKinley Bill this would have been impossible, and, said Mr.
Havemeyer, “as long as the McKinley Bill is there we will exact that
profit.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account