The Tariff in Our TimesTarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
History
The Tariff in Our Times
Tarbell, Ida M. (Ida Minerva)
Tariff -- United States -- History
Throughout his administration Johnson had fought with little effect the
horde of lobbyists, speculators, land grant agents, and other suppliants
for government aid, whom the war had brought together and Congress had
rather encouraged than discouraged. The bills granting tariffs to
special interests belonged to this category unquestionably, however
respectable their supporters, and it was to be expected that Johnson
would veto the copper bill, and he did, sending with his veto the
following message—not his own, however. The letter was written by Mr.
Wells.
_Feb. 23, 1869._
_To the House of Representatives_: The accompanying bill, entitled
“An Act regulating the duties on imported copper and copper ores,”
is, for the following reasons, returned, without my approval, to the
House of Representatives, in which branch of Congress it originated.
Its immediate effect will be to diminish the public receipts, for
the object of the bill cannot be accomplished without seriously
affecting the importation of copper and copper ores, from which a
considerable revenue is at present derived. While thus impairing the
resources of the government, it imposes an additional tax upon an
already overburdened people, who should not be further impoverished
that monopolies may be fostered and corporations enriched.
It is represented, and the declaration seems to be sustained by
evidence, that the duties for which this bill provides are nearly or
quite sufficient to prohibit the importation of certain foreign ores
of copper. Its enactments, therefore, will prove detrimental to the
shipping interests of the nation, and at the same time destroy the
business, for many years successively established, of smelting home
ores in connection with a smaller amount of the imported articles.
This business, it is credibly asserted, has heretofore yielded the
larger share of the copper production of the country, and thus the
industry which this legislation is designed to encourage is actually
less than that which will be destroyed by the passage of the bill.
It seems also to be evident that the effect of this measure will be
to enhance by 70 per cent the cost of blue vitriol—an article
extensively used in dyeing and in the manufacture of printed and
colored cloths. To produce such an augmentation in the price of this
commodity will be to discriminate against other great branches of
domestic industry, and by increasing their cost expose them most
unfairly to the effects of foreign competition. Legislation can be
neither wise nor just which seeks the welfare of a single interest
at the expense and to the injury of many and varied interests at
least equally important and equally deserving the consideration of
Congress.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account