The telephone, the microphone & the phonograph — John Shaqi
The telephone, the microphone & the phonographDu Moncel, Th., comte
History
The telephone, the microphone & the phonograph
Du Moncel, Th., comte
Microphone; Phonograph; Telephone
The invention of this telephone dates, as we have seen, from 1860, and
Professor Heisler speaks of it in his treatise of technical physics,
published at Vienna in 1866; he even asserts, in the article which he
devotes to the subject, that although the instrument was still in its
infancy, it was capable of transmitting vocal melodies, and not merely
musical sounds. The system was afterwards perfected by M. Van der
Weyde, who, after reading the account published by M. Heisler, sought
to make the box of the sender more sonorous, and to strengthen the
sounds produced by the receiver. He writes as follows in the ‘American
Scientific Journal:’
‘In 1868, I caused two telephones to be made, similar to those I have
described, and I exhibited them at a meeting of the Polytechnic Club
of the American Institute. The transmitted sounds were produced at the
farthest extremity of the Cooper Institute, quite outside the hall
in which the audience sat: the receiver was placed on a table in the
hall itself. The vocal airs were faithfully reproduced, but the sound
was rather weak and nasal. I then tried to improve the instrument,
and I first obtained stronger vibrations in the box K by causing
reverberation from the sides of the box, by means of hollow partitions.
I next intensified the sounds produced by the receiver, by introducing
several iron wires into the coil, instead of one. These improvements
were submitted to the meeting of the American Association for the
Advancement of Science, which was held in 1869, and it was considered
that the invention contained the germ of a new method of telegraphic
transmission which might lead to important results.’ This opinion was
soon afterwards justified by the discoveries of Bell and Elisha Gray.
_Messrs. Cecil and Leonard Wray’s Telephone._--This system, represented
in figs. 2 and 3, is simply an improvement on that of M. Reiss, with
the object of intensifying the effects produced. The sender is provided
with two membranes, instead of one; and its receiver, instead of
being formed of a single iron wire covered with a magnetising coil,
is composed of two distinct coils H, H′ (fig. 2), placed in the
same straight line, and within which are two iron rods. These rods
are fastened by one of their ends to two copper disks A, B; these
disks are maintained in a fixed position by screws I, I′, and the
two other extremities of the rods, between the coils, are opposite
each other, not touching, but divided by a very small interval. The
instrument is set upon a sounding-box, in which there is a hole T in
the space corresponding to the interval between the coils: these coils
communicate with four terminals, which are connected with the electric
current in such a way that the adjacent poles of the two rods are of
opposite polarity, thus forming a single magnet, divided in the centre.
It seems that by this arrangement the sound produced becomes much more
distinct.
[Illustration: FIG. 2.]
[Illustration: FIG. 3.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account