The telephone, the microphone & the phonographDu Moncel, Th., comte
History
The telephone, the microphone & the phonograph
Du Moncel, Th., comte
Microphone; Phonograph; Telephone
Mr. Bell sums up the defects still existing in his system as
follows:--1st. The receiver of the messages must have a good musical
ear, in order to distinguish the value of sounds. 2nd. Since the
signals can only take place when the transmitted currents are in
the same direction, two wires must be employed in order to exchange
messages on each side.
He surmounted the first difficulty by providing the receiver with an
instrument which he called the vibrating contact breaker, and which
registered automatically the sounds produced. This contact breaker was
placed in the circuit of a local battery, which could work a Morse
instrument under certain conditions. When the sounds emitted by the
instrument did not correspond with those for which it had been tuned,
the contact breaker had no effect on the telegraphic instrument: it
only acted when the sounds were those which were to be interpreted, and
its action necessarily corresponded to the length of the sounds.
Mr. Bell adds that he applied the system to electro-chemical
telegraphs; but we need not dwell on this part of the invention, since,
as we have said, it is no longer his special study.
_System of M. Lacour of Copenhagen._--M. Lacour’s system was patented
on the 2nd September, 1874, but his experiments were commenced on the
5th June of the same year. Since M. Lacour believed that the vibrations
would be imperceptible on long lines, his first attempts were made on
a somewhat short line; but in November 1874 fresh experiments were made
between Fredericia and Copenhagen on a line 225 miles in length, and
it was ascertained that vibratory effects could be easily transmitted,
even under the influence of a rather weak battery.
[Illustration: FIG. 59.]
In M. Lacour’s system, the sending instrument is a simple tuning-fork,
placed in a horizontal position, and one of its arms reacts on a
contact breaker, which can produce precisely the same number of
discharges of currents as there are vibrations of the tuning-fork. If
a Morse manipulator is inserted in the circuit, it is evident that
if it is worked so as to produce the dots and dashes of the Morse
alphabet, the same signals will be reproduced at the opposite station,
and the signals will be manifested by long and short sounds, if an
electro-magnetic receiver is connected with the circuit. This sender is
shown fig. 59.
Fig. 60 represents M. Lacour’s receiver. It consists of a tuning-fork F
made of soft iron, not of steel like the sending tuning-fork, and each
of its branches is inserted in the bobbin of an electro-magnetic coil
C C; two distinct electro-magnets M M react close to the extremities
of the fork, in such a way that the polarities developed on the two
branches of the fork under the influence of the coils C C should be of
contrary signs to those of the electro-magnets M M.
[Illustration: FIG. 60.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account