The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.Smith, Adam
Philosophy
The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.
Smith, Adam
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Language and languages -- Early works to 1800
To be amiable and to be meritorious, that is, to deserve love and to
deserve reward, are the great characters of virtue, and to be odious and
punishable, of vice. But all these characters have an immediate
reference to the sentiments of others. Virtue is not said to be amiable
or to be meritorious, because it is the object of its own love, or of
its own gratitude; but because it excites those sentiments in other men.
The consciousness that it is the object of such favourable regards is
the source of that inward tranquillity and self-satisfaction with which
it is naturally attended, as the suspicion of the contrary gives
occasion to the torments of vice. What so great happiness as to be
beloved, and to know that we deserve to be beloved? What so great misery
as to be hated, and to know that we deserve to be hated?
Man is considered as a moral, because he is regarded as an accountable
being. But an accountable being, as the word expresses, is a being that
must give an account of its actions to some other, and that consequently
must regulate them according to the good liking of this other. Man is
accountable to God and his fellow-creatures. But though he is, no doubt,
principally accountable to God; in the order of time, he must
necessarily conceive himself as accountable to his fellow-creatures,
before he can form any idea of the Deity, or of the rules by which that
divine being will judge of his conduct. A child surely conceives itself
as accountable to its parents, and is elevated or cast down by the
thought of their merited approbation or disapprobation, long before it
forms any idea of its accountableness to the Deity, or of the rules by
which that divine being will judge of its conduct.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account