The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.Smith, Adam
Philosophy
The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.
Smith, Adam
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Language and languages -- Early works to 1800
When the original passions of the person principally concerned are in
perfect concord with the sympathetic emotions of the spectator, they
necessarily appear to this last just and proper, and suitable to their
objects; and, on the contrary, when, upon bringing the case home to
himself, he finds that they do not coincide with what he feels, they
necessarily appear to him unjust and improper, and unsuitable to the
causes which excite them. To approve of the passions of another,
therefore, as suitable to their objects, is the same thing as to observe
that we entirely sympathize with them; and not to approve of them as
such, is the same thing as to observe that we do not entirely sympathize
with them. The man who resents the injuries that have been done to me,
and observes that I resent them precisely as he does, necessarily
approves of my resentment. The man whose sympathy keeps time to my
grief, cannot but admit the reasonableness of my sorrow. He who admires
the same poem, or the same picture, and admires them exactly as I do,
must surely allow the justness of my admiration. He who laughs at the
same joke, and laughs along with me, cannot well deny the propriety of
my laughter. On the contrary, the person who, upon these different
occasions, either feels no such emotion as that which I feel, or feels
none that bears any proportion to mine, cannot avoid disapproving my
sentiments on account of their dissonance with his own. If my animosity
goes beyond what the indignation of my friend can correspond to; if my
grief exceeds what his most tender compassion can go along with; if my
admiration is either too high or too low to tally with his own; if I
laugh loud and heartily when he only smiles, or, on the contrary, only
smile when he laughs loud and heartily; in all these cases, as soon as
he comes from considering the object, to observe how I am affected by
it, according as there is more or less disproportion between his
sentiments and mine, I must incur a greater or less degree of his
disapprobation: and upon all occasions his own sentiments are the
standards and measures by which he judges of mine.
To approve of another man’s opinions is to adopt those opinions, and to
adopt them is to approve of them. If the same arguments which convince
you convince me likewise, I necessarily approve of your conviction; and
if they do not, I necessarily disapprove of it: neither can I possibly
conceive that I should do the one without the other. To approve or
disapprove, therefore, of the opinions of others is acknowledged, by
every body, to mean no more than to observe their agreement or
disagreement with our own. But this is equally the case with regard to
our approbation or disapprobation of the sentiments or passions of
others.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account