The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.Smith, Adam
Philosophy
The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.
Smith, Adam
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Language and languages -- Early works to 1800
This reverence is still further enhanced by an opinion which is first
impressed by nature, and afterwards confirmed by reasoning and
philosophy, that those important rules of morality, are the commands and
laws of the Deity, who will finally reward the obedient, and punish the
transgressors of their duty.
This opinion or apprehension, I say, seems first to be impressed by
nature. Men are naturally led to ascribe to those mysterious beings,
whatever they are, which happen, in any country, to be the objects of
religious fear, all their own sentiments and passions. They have no
other, they can conceive no other to ascribe to them. Those unknown
intelligences which they imagine but see not, must necessarily be formed
with some sort of resemblance to those intelligences of which they have
experience. During the ignorance and darkness of pagan superstition,
mankind seem to have formed the ideas of their divinities with so little
delicacy, that they ascribed to them, indiscriminately, all the passions
of human nature, those not excepted which do the least honour to our
species, such as lust, hunger, avarice, envy, revenge. They could not
fail therefore, to ascribe to those beings, for the excellence of whose
nature they still conceived the highest admiration, those sentiments and
qualities which are the great ornaments of humanity, and which seem to
raise it to a resemblance of divine perfection, the love of virtue and
beneficence, and the abhorrence of vice and injustice. The man who was
injured, called upon Jupiter to be witness of the wrong that was done to
him, and could not doubt, but that divine being would behold it with the
same indignation which would animate the meanest of mankind, who looked
on when injustice was committed. The man who did the injury, felt
himself to be the proper object of detestation and resentment of
mankind; and his natural fears led him to impute the same sentiments to
those awful beings, whose presence he could not avoid, and whose power
he could not resist. These natural hopes and fears, and suspicions, were
propagated by sympathy, and confirmed by education; and the gods were
universally represented and believed to be the rewarders of humanity and
mercy, and the avengers of perfidy and injustice. And thus religion,
even in its rudest form, gave a sanction to the rules of morality, long
before the age of artificial reasoning and philosophy. That the terrors
of religion should thus enforce the natural sense of duty, was of too
much importance to the happiness of mankind, for nature to leave it
dependent upon the slowness and uncertainty of philosophical researches.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account