The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.Smith, Adam
Philosophy
The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.
Smith, Adam
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Language and languages -- Early works to 1800
These researches, however, when they came to take place, confirmed those
original anticipations of nature. Upon whatever we suppose that our
moral faculties are founded, whether upon a certain modification of
reason, upon an original instinct, called a moral sense, or upon some
other principle of our nature, it cannot be doubted, that they were
given us for the direction of our conduct in this life. They carry along
with them the most evident badges of this authority, which denote that
they were set up within us to be the supreme arbiters of all our
actions, to superintend all our senses, passions, and appetites, and to
judge how far each of them was either to be indulged or restrained. Our
moral faculties are by no means, as some have pretended, upon a level in
this respect with the other faculties and appetites of our nature,
endowed with no more right to restrain these last, than these last are
to restrain them. No other faculty or principle of action judges of any
other. Love does not judge of resentment, nor resentment of love. Those
two passions may be opposite to one another, but cannot, with any
propriety, be said to approve or disapprove of one another. But it is
the peculiar office of those faculties now under our consideration to
judge, to bestow censure or applause upon all the other principles of
our nature. They may be considered as a sort of senses of which those
principles are the objects. Every sense is supreme over its own objects.
There is no appeal from the eye with regard to the beauty of colours,
nor from the ear with regard to the harmony of sounds, nor from the
taste with regard to the agreeableness of flavours. Each of those senses
judges in the last resort of its own objects. Whatever gratifies the
taste is sweet, whatever pleases the eye is beautiful, whatever sooths
the ear is harmonious. The very essence of each of those qualities
consists in being fitted to please the sense to which it is addressed.
It belongs to our moral faculties, in the same manner to determine when
the ear ought to be soothed, when the eye ought to be indulged, when the
taste ought to be gratified, when and how far every other principle of
our nature ought to be indulged or restrained. What is agreeable to our
moral faculties, is fit, and right, and proper to be done; the contrary
wrong, unfit, and improper. The sentiments which they approve of, are
graceful and unbecoming. The very words, right, wrong, fit, improper,
graceful, unbecoming, mean only what pleases or displeases those
faculties.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account