The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.Smith, Adam
Philosophy
The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.
Smith, Adam
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Language and languages -- Early works to 1800
It rarely happens that we break in upon that plan of conduct, which the
governing principle prescribes, and which in all our cool hours we had
laid down to ourselves as what was most proper for us to pursue, but
when prompted by one or other of those two different sets of passions;
either by ungovernable ambition and resentment, or by the importunate
solicitations of present ease and pleasure. But though these two orders
of passions are so apt to mislead us, they are still considered as
necessary parts of human nature: the first having been given to defend
us against injuries, to assert our rank and dignity in the world, to
make us aim at what is noble and honourable, and to make us distinguish
those who act in the same manner; the second to provide for the support
and necessities of the body.
In the strength, acuteness, and perfection of the governing principle
was placed the essential virtue of prudence, which, according to Plato,
consisted in a just and clear discernment, founded upon general and
scientific ideas, of the ends which were proper to be pursued, and of
the means which were proper for attaining them.
When the first set of passions, those of the irascible part of the soul,
had that degree of strength and firmness, which enabled them, under the
direction of reason, to despise all dangers in the pursuit of what was
honourable and noble; it constituted the virtue of fortitude and
magnanimity. This order of passions, according to this system, was of a
more generous and noble nature than the other. They were considered upon
many occasions as the auxiliaries of reason, to check and restrain the
inferior and brutal appetites. We are often angry at ourselves, it was
observed, we often become the objects of our own resentment and
indignation, when the love of pleasure prompts to do what we disapprove
of; and the irascible part of our nature is in this manner called in to
assist the rational against the concupiscible.
When all those three different parts of our nature were in perfect
concord with one another, when neither the irascible nor concupiscible
passions ever aimed at any gratification which reason did not approve
of, and when reason never commanded any thing, but what these of their
own accord were willing to perform; this happy composure, this perfect
and complete harmony of soul, constituted that virtue which in their
language is expressed by a word which we commonly translate temperance,
but which might more properly be translated good temper, or sobriety and
moderation of mind.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account