The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.Smith, Adam
Philosophy
The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.
Smith, Adam
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Language and languages -- Early works to 1800
Justice, the last and greatest of the four cardinal virtues, took place,
according to this system, when each of those three faculties of the mind
confined itself to its proper office, without attempting to encroach
upon that of any other; when reason directed and passion obeyed, and
when each passion performed its proper duty, and exerted itself towards
its proper object easily and without reluctance, and with that degree of
force and energy, which was suitable to the value of what it pursued. In
this consisted that complete virtue, that perfect propriety of conduct,
which Plato, after some of the ancient Pythagoreans, denominated
Justice.
The word, it is to be observed, which expresses justice in the Greek
language, has several different meanings; and as the correspondent word
in all other languages, so far as I know, has the same, there must be
some natural affinity among those various significations. In one sense
we are said to do justice to our neighbour when we abstain from doing
him any positive harm, and do not directly hurt him, either in his
person, or in his estate, or in his reputation. This is that justice
which I have treated of above, the observance of which may be extorted
by force, and the violation of which exposes to punishment. In another
sense we are said not to do justice to our neighbour unless we conceive
for him all that love, respect and esteem, which his character, his
situation, and his connexion with ourselves, render suitable and proper
for us to feel, and unless we act accordingly. It is in this sense that
we are said to do injustice to a man of merit who is connected with us,
tho’ we abstain from hurting him in every respect, if we do not exert
ourselves to serve him and to place him in that situation in which the
impartial spectator would be pleased to see him. The first sense of the
word coincides with what Aristotle and the Schoolmen call commutative
justice, and with what Grotius calls the _justitia expletrix_, which
consists in abstaining from what is another’s, and in doing voluntarily
whatever we can with propriety be forced to do. The second sense of the
word coincides with what some have called distributive justice[9], and
with the _justitia attributrix_ of Grotius, which consists in proper
beneficence, in the becoming use of what is our own, and in the applying
it to those purposes either of charity or generosity, to which it is
most suitable, in our situation, that it should be applied. In this
sense justice comprehends all the social virtues. There is yet another
sense in which the word justice is sometimes taken, still more extensive
than either of the former, though very much akin to the last; and which
runs too, so far as I know, through all languages. It is in this last
sense that we are said to be unjust, when we do not seem to value any
particular object with that degree of esteem, or to pursue it with that
degree of ardour which to the impartial spectator it may appear to
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account