The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.Smith, Adam
Philosophy
The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.
Smith, Adam
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Language and languages -- Early works to 1800
But the pleasures and pains of the mind, though ultimately derived from
those of the body, were vastly greater than their originals. The body
felt only the sensation of the present instant, whereas the mind felt
also the past and the future, the one by remembrance, the other by
anticipation, and consequently both suffered and enjoyed much more. When
we are under the greatest bodily pain, he observed, we shall always
find, if we attend to it, that it is not the suffering of the present
instant which chiefly torments us, but either the agonizing remembrance
of the past, or the yet more horrible dread of the future. The pain of
each instant, considered by itself, and cut off from all that goes
before and all that comes after it, is a trifle not worth the regarding.
Yet this is all which the body can ever be said to suffer. In the same
manner, when we enjoy the greatest pleasure, we shall always find that
the bodily sensation, the sensation of the present instant makes but a
small part of our happiness, that our enjoyment chiefly arises either
from the chearful recollection of the past, or the still more joyous
anticipation of the future, and that the mind always contributes by much
the largest share of the entertainment.
Since our happiness and misery, therefore, depended chiefly on the mind,
if this part of our nature was well disposed, if our thoughts and
opinions were as they should be, it was of little importance in what
manner our body was affected. Though under great bodily pain, we might
still enjoy a considerable share of happiness, if our reason and
judgment maintained their superiority. We might entertain ourselves with
the remembrance of past, and with the hopes of future pleasure; we might
soften the rigour of our pains, by recollecting what it was which, even
in this situation, we were under any necessity of suffering. That this
was merely the bodily sensation, the pain of the present instant, which
by itself could never be very great. That whatever agony we suffered
from the dread of its continuance was the effect of an opinion of the
mind, which might be corrected by juster sentiments; by considering
that, if our pains were violent, they would probably be of short
duration; and that if they were of long continuance, they would probably
be moderate, and admit of many intervals of ease; and that, at any rate,
death was always at hand and within call to deliver us, which as,
according to him, it put an end to all sensation, either of pain or
pleasure, could not be regarded as an evil. When we are, said he, death
is not; and when death is, we are not; death therefore can be nothing to
us.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account