The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.Smith, Adam
Philosophy
The Theory of Moral Sentiments: Or, an Essay Towards an Analysis of the Principles by Which Men Naturally Judge Concerning the Conduct and Character, First of Their Neighbours, and Afterwards of Themselves. to Which Is Added, a Dissertation on the Origin of Languages.
Smith, Adam
Ethics -- Early works to 1800; Language and languages -- Early works to 1800
But whatever may be the cause of sympathy, or however it may be excited,
nothing pleases us more than to observe in other men a fellow-feeling
with all the emotions of our own breast; nor are we ever so much shocked
as by the appearance of the contrary. Those who are fond of deducing all
our sentiments from certain refinements of self-love, think themselves
at no loss to account, according to their own principles, both for this
pleasure and this pain. Man, say they, conscious of his own weakness and
of the need which he has for the assistance of others, rejoices whenever
he observes that they adopt his own passions, because he is then assured
of that assistance; and grieves whenever he observes the contrary,
because he is then assured of their opposition. But both the pleasure
and the pain are always felt so instantaneously, and often upon such
frivolous occasions, that it seems evident that neither of them can be
derived from any such self-interested consideration. A man is mortified
when, after having endeavored to divert the company, he looks round and
sees that no body laughs at his jests but himself. On the contrary, the
mirth of the company is highly agreeable to him, and he regards this
correspondence of their sentiments with his own as the greatest
applause.
Neither does his pleasure seem to arise altogether from the additional
vivacity which his mirth may receive from sympathy with theirs, nor his
pain from the disappointment he meets with when he misses this pleasure;
though both the one and the other, no doubt, do in some measure. When we
have read a book or poem so often that we can no longer find any
amusement in reading it by ourselves, we can still take pleasure in
reading it to a companion. To him it has all the graces of novelty; we
enter into the surprise and admiration which it naturally excites in
him, but which it is no longer capable of exciting in us; we consider
all the ideas which it presents rather in the light in which they appear
to him, than in that in which they appear to ourselves, and we are
amused by sympathy with his amusement which thus enlivens our own. On
the contrary, we should be vexed if he did not seem to be entertained
with it, and we could no longer take any pleasure in reading it to him.
It is the same case here. The mirth of the company, no doubt, enlivens
our own mirth, and their silence, no doubt, disappoints us. But though
this may contribute both to the pleasure which we derive from the one,
and to the pain which we feel from the other, it is by no means the sole
cause of either; and this correspondence of the sentiments of others
with our own appears to be a cause of pleasure, and the want of it a
cause of pain, which cannot be accounted for in this manner. The
sympathy, which my friends express with my joy, might, indeed, give me
pleasure by enlivening that joy: but that which they express with my
grief could give me none, if it served only to enliven that grief.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account