The Theosophical Path Illustrated Monthly Volume 1, July-December, 1911
Religion
The Theosophical Path Illustrated Monthly Volume 1, July-December, 1911
Theosophy -- Periodicals
A crystal of metal consists of molecules, and they of the still smaller
atoms. Each atom, in its turn, is made of the still smaller electrons
or corpuscles. If these either _are_ light, or are made of even smaller
bodies which are, the definition is justified. This is the suggestion,
or contention, of Professor Bragg, developed at a recent lecture
delivered before the English Royal Institution.
Light is regarded as a spreading etheric pulsation, waves in ether. We
have it as the visible seven colors from red up to violet, and beyond
visibility as the ultra-violet. Still higher etheric pulses, according
to the usual theory, are the _x_-rays. Professor Bragg applies his new
corpuscular theory to the last alone, though he suggests that it also
includes the ultra-violet rays--in which case it must include all the
rest. He thinks the _x_-rays corpuscular because of a certain behavior;
but the ultra-violet rays have the same behavior--and no one doubts
_their_ continuity with the lower rays down to--and far below--the red.
What is the behavior on which the argument rests?
The term _x_-rays or kathode rays, as popularly used, covers three
kinds of emanation in the tube or from radium. The first and grossest
ingredient is ordinary matter, whirling atoms of the element helium.
The next and finer, the intermediate, is electrons, corpuscles. The
third and finest is _x_-rays proper, hitherto considered as merely
etheric pulses. Professor Bragg calls them _gamma_ rays, restricting
the other term, _x_-rays, for other rays of properties so nearly the
same that he includes them in the same argument.
When _gamma_ (or _x_-) rays fall on an atom of matter they cause it to
discharge one or more of its electrons or corpuscles, the intermediate
of the three emanations popularly included under the term _x_-rays. In
this connexion they are called _beta_ rays.
The professor points out that when _gamma_ (or _x_-) rays produce this
discharge from an atom
the _beta_ rays to a large degree continue the line of motion of the
_gamma_ rays, as if the latter pushed them out of the atoms; and,
lastly, that the number of the _beta_ rays depends on the intensity of
the _gamma_ rays.
The _gamma_ ray, entering an atom, pushes out a corpuscle, a _beta_
ray, and takes its place. It behaves, in fact, as if it were itself a
corpuscle, and the word ray is not well descriptive either of it or the
_beta_. Nor can it be a mere ether-pulse. The professor suggests that
it is a corpuscle, an electron, which has had the ordinary negative
charge of electricity proper to electrons neutralized by a positive.
Then he proceeds:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account