The Thirteenth Hussars in the Great WarDurand, H. Mortimer (Henry Mortimer)
History
The Thirteenth Hussars in the Great War
Durand, H. Mortimer (Henry Mortimer)
Great Britain. Army. Hussars, 13th; World War, 1914-1918 -- Regimental histories -- Great Britain
It would be confusing to follow up at this point General Maude’s
summary of his operations, but enough of it has been given to show that
from the time he took command he contemplated a “resolute offensive” on
the Tigris, threatening Baghdad, and that his preliminary preparations
for that movement were steadily pushed on until the 12th December, when
all was ready.
The immediate field of conflict on the Tigris, and the positions
occupied by the conflicting armies, are shown in the accompanying
sketch-map.
[Illustration: SKETCH OF BRITISH POSITION ON TIGRIS DECEMBER 1916.
_A.B.C.D.E._
SCALE ABOUT 8·1 MILES TO THE INCH]
The Turks were astride the river. On the north or left bank they held
the same positions as they had occupied since the fall of Kut. At
Sannaiyat the enemy awaited attack in the same formidable labyrinth of
trenches, flanked by marsh and river, from which in the early part of
the year he had three times repelled the desperate onslaught of our
troops. “Since then he had strengthened and elaborated this trench
system, and a series of successive positions extended back as far as
Kut, fifteen miles in the rear. The river bank from Sannaiyat to Kut
was also intrenched.” On the south or right bank of the river the enemy
was not so far forward. He had, on this side, withdrawn to a line of
intrenched defences which curved from a point on the Tigris, only
about three miles east of Kut, to a point on the Hai stream, and thence
round again to the Tigris west of Kut. The Hai stream was also held for
some miles southward with posts and mounted Arab auxiliaries.
The British troops held the north bank of the Tigris up to the Turkish
trenches at Sannaiyat, and the south bank for about eleven miles
farther up-stream. Thus, as General Maude points out, the British
were strategically better situated than the enemy, for while their
flanks were secure the withdrawal of the enemy’s troops on the south
bank seemed to offer a chance for a blow sooner or later at his
communications on the north bank, which would mean the retreat or
capture of the force at Sannaiyat.
In these circumstances it was decided that the proper course was,
first, to secure possession of the Hai stream, then to clear the
enemy’s trench systems on the right bank of the Tigris, and finally
to cross the Tigris as far west as possible. This idea of a turning
movement by the south was not a new one, for during the British
operations for the relief of Kut more than one attempt had been made
to seize the Hai; but the British forces had been too weak, and the
attempts had failed. Now, as shown above, General Maude’s army was
better fitted in numbers and equipment to make the attempt with success.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account