This touches one point merely, and only applies to married women. In all
that concerns “free” women, by what right are they condemned to abstain
from making full use of their independence, as most men do? “Woman’s
life, like man’s,” says Miramont, “is a harmonious evolution, by which
every phase is developed, and which thus brings into play a succession
of forms and aspects of existence. Daughter, mother and grandmother;
dreamer, fighter, thinker--woman, like man, passes through many
transformations in the course of life, and is always progressive.”
By the same fact of social evolution, thanks to her participation in the
battle of life, and also to a rational education, it has long been
proved that woman is not an inferior creature, of no use save for the
propagation of the species.
We are far removed, happily, from the theories of Schopenhauer, who
declared that woman was afflicted with intellectual shortness of sight,
that she was childish, futile and narrow, inferior to man in everything
concerning rectitude and scrupulous honesty; that she was lacking in
sense and reflection, incapable of taking any unbiased view, etc. etc.
If woman’s characteristic feature be that nature has destined her for
motherhood, it is none the less true that, just as she has a fine skin
and quick sensibilities, her intellect is prompt to seize details, and
that she possesses a brain as well furnished as that of man.
Her apparent inferiority comes from the fact that woman is oppressed by
the law and ill-treated by the moralist, whence result her native
timidity and diffidence. The truth is that man, desiring to keep the
supremacy attributed to him, does not care to see in woman the qualities
of courage and independence. He will not admit the immanent struggle
between two beings inspired by the same needs and the same desires. Men
would like women to remain tied down to household cares, while thinking
women who have ceased to resign themselves to this wish their sex to
profit by all the rights of men.
The partisans of absolute feminism desire that there should be no
difference between men and women, in the name of biological equality
which incites them to claim social equality.
Without going so far as this, it is certain that women should now enjoy
more independence and be authorised, without losing caste in the eyes of
moralists, to prove the strength of their personal faculties.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account