Nevertheless, in self-judgment, it is right to apply severely to
ourselves the rules of reason and virtue so far as our own nature
permits. It is to be noted that witty people, or those with a good
memory, are not the most capable of clear and profound judgment.
Assimilation is prejudicial to reflection; memory is not thought.
When our own ideas are clear to us, we shall not judge others without
due study of their reasons for what they do, the motives by which they
have been governed, the circumstances which may have influenced their
estimate of good and evil. Thus our attitude will be more kindly, and
we shall avoid all the evils springing from injustice and false
judgment.
Our own conscience is not always in the ascendant. We often yield to
weakness, and it is only just that our knowledge of the limitations of
the human will should move us to indulgence towards our fellow-men.
Such indulgence consists in recognising our own weaknesses, and in not
condemning others for what we consider their errors.
The first condition for judging clearly and soundly is the constant
attention to our mental life, acknowledging to ourselves our own changes
of mood, ceaselessly fighting the enemy within us.
From the altruistic point of view, we should picture to ourselves the
person to be judged in the circumstances which have prompted his
action--difficult though it be to perceive the differences between
characters and shades of feeling--according to the numberless cases in
which such action takes place. This is the reason why historians, in the
act of composition, so often pass false judgments on the past. In their
desire to make the characters live again, to call up vanished scenes,
they become partisans, loving or hating those whom they have never
known. Purely in deference to their own opinion, they fail in tolerance
and indulgence. They do not estimate the worth of men of past days
according to the moral tone of the epoch in which they lived; they judge
of a society as a whole in the light of isolated documents, so that the
men of vanished ages cut but a poor figure in their eyes to-day.
Now, the truth is that men are no greater now than in the other ages of
the world. Removed from our own time by twenty-two centuries, the heroes
of Plutarch remain as noble as our heroes of to-day; and in the domain
of science, religion, and philosophy we have but changed names without
changing at all in judgment and logic, without modifying the conditions
of happiness or the outward signs of courage, and without developing the
human “_I_.”
THE FEAR OF RIDICULE
The fear of ridicule is a terrible and powerful weapon in the eyes of
many people. Cleverly handled by those who are slaves to custom and
fashion, this fear of ridicule often prevents our obeying our true
feelings, and leads us to act against our own interests.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account