The Three Perils of Man; or, War, Women, and Witchcraft, Vol. 3 (of 3) — John Shaqi
The Three Perils of Man; or, War, Women, and Witchcraft, Vol. 3 (of 3)Hogg, James
History
The Three Perils of Man; or, War, Women, and Witchcraft, Vol. 3 (of 3)
Hogg, James
Historical fiction; Scotland -- History -- Robert II, 1371-1390 -- Fiction
Every one protested against Tam's motion with abhorrence; and it was
agreed that they would now appeal to the Master who had told the
worst tale. Not that the unfortunate victim was to be immediately
sacrificed, nor even till the very last extremity; but with that
impatience natural to man, they longed to be put out of pain; every
one having hopes that his own merits protected himself from danger.
Every one also believed that judgment would be given against Tam,
except he himself; and that, at all events, such an award would put an
end to his disagreeable and endless exultations of voracious delight.
They then went before the renowned wizard, and desired him to give
judgment who of them had related the worst and most inefficient tale,
laying all prejudice with regard to creeds and testimonies aside.
He asked them if they referred the matter entirely to him, or if they
wished to have each one a vote of their own? Tam said it was an
understanding at first that each should have a vote, and, as he had
made up his mind on the subject, he wished to give his. Charlie said
it was a hard matter to vote away the life of a friend; and, for his
part, he would rather appeal to the great Master altogether. But if
any doubts should remain with any one of their host's impartiality, he
thought it fairer that they should cast lots, and hazard all alike.
The poet, who had heard the Master's disapprobation given pointedly of
his tale, sided with Yardbire, and voted that it should be decided by
lot. Gibbie, though quite convinced in his own mind that he had told
the best story, yet having heard the _morality_ of it doubted, and
dreading on that score to have some voices against him, called also
for a vote; for he said the referring the matter to the Master brought
him in mind of the story of the fox sitting in judgment, and deciding
against the lamb. The friar also said, "Verily, I should give my voice
for the judgment of the Master to stand decisive: But, lo! is it not
apparent that his thoughts are not like the thoughts of other men?
Neither is his mind governed by the motives of the rest of the
children of men. I do therefore lift up my voice for the judgment that
goeth by lot. I would, notwithstanding of all this, gladly hear what
the Master would say."
"I will be so far just that I shall give you your choice," said Master
Michael Scott: "Nevertheless I can tell you, if there be any justice
in the decision by lot, on whom the lot will fall." A pause of
breathless anxiety occurred, and every eye was fixed on the grim and
stern visage of the great necromancer, over whose features there
appeared to pass a gleam of wild delight. "It will fall," added he,
"on that man of fables and similitudes, who himself bears the
similitude of a man, just as the lion's hide stuffed does the
resemblance of a real one. How do you call that beautiful and amiable
being with the nose that would split a drop of rain without being
wet?"
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account