The Three Voyages of Captain Cook Round the World. Vol. V. Being the First of the Third Voyage — John Shaqi
The Three Voyages of Captain Cook Round the World. Vol. V. Being the First of the Third VoyageCook, James
History
The Three Voyages of Captain Cook Round the World. Vol. V. Being the First of the Third Voyage
Cook, James
Cook, James, 1728-1779 -- Travel; Explorers -- Great Britain -- Biography; Voyages around the world -- History -- 18th century
The accuracy, or rather the fidelity of this report was denied by Mr.
Dobbs, who contended that this opening _is a strait, and not a fresh
water river_, and that Middleton, if he had examined it properly, would
have found a passage through it to the Western American Ocean. The
failure of this voyage, therefore, only served to furnish our zealous
advocate for the discovery, with new arguments for attempting it once
more; and he had the good fortune, after getting the reward of twenty
thousand pounds established by act of parliament, to prevail upon a
society of gentlemen and merchants to fit out the Dobbs and California;
which ships, it was hoped, would be able to find their way into the
Pacific Ocean, by the very opening which Middleton’s voyage had pointed
out, and which he was believed to have misrepresented.
This renovation of hope only produced fresh disappointment. For it is
well known, that the voyage of the Dobbs and California, instead of
confuting, strongly confirmed all that Middleton had asserted. The
supposed strait was found to be nothing more than a fresh water river,
and its utmost western navigable boundaries were now ascertained, by
accurate examination. But though Wager’s Strait had thus disappointed
our hopes, as had also done Rankin’s Inlet, which was now found to be a
close bay; and though other arguments, founded on the supposed course of
the tides in Hudson’s Bay appeared to be groundless, such is our
attachment to an opinion once adopted, that, even after the unsuccessful
issue of the voyage of the Dobbs and California, a passage through some
other place in that bay was, by many, considered as attainable; and,
particularly, Chesterfield’s (formerly called Bowden’s) Inlet, lying
between latitude 63° and 64°, succeeded Wager’s Strait, in the sanguine
expectations of those who remained unconvinced by former
disappointments. Mr. Ellis, who was on board the ships, and who wrote
the history of the voyage, holds up this as one of the places where the
passage may be sought for, _upon very rational grounds, and with very
good effects_.[44] He also mentions Repulse Bay, nearly in latitude 67°;
but as to this he speaks less confidently; only saying, that by an
attempt there, we might probably _approach nearer to the discovery_.[45]
He had good reason for thus guarding his expression; for the committee
who directed this voyage, admitting the impracticability of effecting a
passage at Repulse Bay, had refused allowing the ships to go into it,
_being satisfied as to that place_.[46]
Setting Repulse Bay, therefore, aside, within which we have no reason
for believing that any inlet exists, there remained no part of Hudson’s
Bay to be searched, but Chesterfield’s Inlet, and a small track of coast
between the latitude 62°, and what is called the South Point of Main,
which had been left unexplored by the Dobbs and California.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account