The Threshold Covenant; or, The Beginning of Religious RitesTrumbull, H. Clay (Henry Clay)
Religion
The Threshold Covenant; or, The Beginning of Religious Rites
Trumbull, H. Clay (Henry Clay)
Covenants -- Religious aspects
At present in India the most widely recognized visible aid in worship is
the representation of the _linga_ and the _yoni_ combined. This symbol
nominally stands for Siva; but that seems to be only because Saivism
predominates in modern Hindooism. The idea of this symbolic combination
long antedates this prominence of Siva worship.[529]
A form of Booddhist prayer in Tibet, said to be repeated more frequently
than any other known among men, is “the six-syllabled sentence, ‘_Om
mani padme Hūm_,’–‘Om! the Jewel in the Lotus! Hum!’” This prayer is
simply a euphemism for the primitive Threshold Covenant, as here
explained, with an ejaculatory invocation and ascription before and
after it.[530] It seems to be a survival of the thought that here was
the beginning of religious rites, and that all covenant worship must
continue in its spirit and power.
Every repetition of that prayer, by speech or by mechanism, is supposed
to affect the progress of a soul in its crossing the threshold of one of
the stages of being in the universe. It is a help to a new birth for
some soul somewhere.
There would thus appear to be no room for doubt in this matter in the
language and customs of the primitive Aryan peoples, and there are also
confirmations of the idea among the Semites. A legend that has a place
among the Jews and the Muhammadans, tells of a visit of Abraham to the
home of Hagar and Ishmael in Arabia.[531] An Amalekite wife of Ishmael
refused hospitality to Abraham, and in consequence Abraham left a
message to Ishmael to “change his threshold.” This message Ishmael
understood to mean the putting away of his wife and the taking of
another, and he acted accordingly. In the Arabic “a wife” is one of the
meanings of the term “threshold.”[532]
And the term “gate,” or “door,” had among the rabbis a specific
application to the altar of family covenanting. Thus Buxtorf, in his
definings of “_janua_” and “_ostium_,” says plainly: “_Apud rabbinos
etiam est ‘ostium ventris muliebris.’_” And he quotes the saying of a
disappointed bridegroom : “_Ostium apertum inveni._”[533]
Among the early Babylonians and Egyptians, as among other primitive
peoples, the twofold symbols of sex are counted the sacred emblem of
life, and as such are borne by the gods of life, and by those who have
the power of life and death from those gods. The circle and rod, or ring
and bolt, conjoined, are in the right hand of the Babylonian sun-god
Shamash;[534] as, in the _ankh_, or _crux ansata_, they are in the right
hand of every principal deity of ancient Egypt.[535] It is much the same
with the Phœnicians and others.[536]
In the innermost shrine of the most sacred Shinto temples of Japan, the
circular mirror, and the straight dagger, with the same meaning as the
circle and rod in Babylonia and Egypt and Phœnicia, are the only
indications of the presence of deity; and the worshipers in those
temples can come no farther than the threshold of the shrine containing
these emblems.[537]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account