Type: fractional burial. Condition: poor. Position: ? Sex: ? Remarks: Double burial involving only the leg bones. In one burial the greater part of both femora was present. The original burial position could have been either flexed or extended, i.e., if the corpse has been interred _in toto_ in the first place. In the second burial most of the two tibiae and parts of both femora remained, their position strongly suggesting flexure. It is impossible to say to what extent the burials were disturbed, or what happened to the rest of the bodies. Artifacts in association: none. Table 1 Burials LAn-1 ========================================================================= | Burial number Burial data |------------------------------------------------ | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ------------------------|------------------------------------------------ Depth from surface | (inches) | 12 19 18 19 13 7 6 30 50 24 12 26 Primary inhumation | ... x x x x x ... ... ... ... ? ? Reburial | ... ... ... ... ... ... x x x ... ? ? Fractional burial | x ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... x ... ... Extended on ventral side| ... ... ... x ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... Flexed | ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ? ... ... Head oriented | ... s ssw s s s ... ... ... ... ... ... Artifacts associated | ... ... x x x x x x x ... ... ... ------------------------------------------------------------------------- _Burial 11_ (Pl. 18, _a_) Location: section 15R13. Depth: 12 in. Type: partial reburial or disturbed primary burial. Condition: poor. Position: indeterminable. Sex: indeterminable. Remarks: Fragments of long bones, mandible, and maxilla present. Position of mandible and maxilla among the leg bones suggests either a former disturbance of a primary inhumation or a secondary burial. Artifacts in association: possible feature 15C and a cogged stone found about 18 inches away. _Burial 12_ Location: section 17R7. Depth: 26 in. Type: indeterminable. Condition: poor. Position: indeterminable. Sex: indeterminable. Remarks: Bone disintegration and what seemed to have been disturbance obviated taking adequate information. Artifacts in association: none. DESCRIPTION OF ARTIFACTS To avoid repetition of description, only those types or groups of specimens not covered in the earlier report will be fully discussed here. Such categories as have already been isolated and defined will be treated in summary fashion. For complete descriptive data, the 1947 account of the Topanga Culture should be consulted. The total tabulations of the major groups of artifacts derived from both season's excavations will be presented in this paper.