The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
Anne Askew’s death appears to have been fraught with some danger to
Queen Catherine Parr. Aware of the Queen’s sympathy for Anne, and
her leaning towards the Reformed faith, Wriothesley, the bigoted
Lord Chancellor, went so far as to draw up a warrant for Catherine’s
arrest. Fortunately for the Queen she was warned of her danger, and
either was actually frightened into a fever, or feigned illness.
During an interview with the King, the suffering Queen so worked upon
his feelings, that when Wriothesley appeared with a guard to take her
into custody, Henry turned upon him, and, heaping the foulest abuse
upon him, drove him from the presence (Speed’s Chronicle). Luckily for
Catherine Parr the days of Henry were near their end, or it is more
than probable that she would have shared the fate of Anne Boleyn and
Catherine Howard.
In 1546 peace had been made between England and France, and in order
to ratify the treaty the French sent their Lord High Admiral to
England, with the Bishop of Evreux, and some other nobles. Landing at
Greenwich, they were conducted with great ceremony to the Tower—where
a splendid banquet awaited them in the palace of the fortress—by the
Earls of Essex and Derby in the royal barge. After leaving the Tower
they proceeded to Lambeth Palace, and thence to Hampton Court, where
the treaty was signed. These were the last guests of the Sovereign in
the Tower. The last State prisoner to be executed in Henry’s reign was
the gifted and brilliantly endowed Earl of Surrey, the eldest son of
Thomas Howard, third Duke of Norfolk, who, as I have said before, also
narrowly escaped with his life.
Henry VIII., for the good of his people, was dying fast at the close of
the year 1546. His once handsome and athletic form had become a bloated
mass of corruption. His nature, always cruel, became fiend-like during
his later years, owing to his physical sufferings. He knew that death
was gaining upon him rapidly, but whilst he lived he determined still
to destroy, and when even in the very grasp of the King of Terrors,
still sent out his death orders. No cause can be assigned for the King,
while his wicked old life was fast ebbing away from him, ordering the
death of Norfolk and his son Surrey. The only possible reason was that
perhaps Henry feared they might wield too great an influence after his
death, when his heir, Edward, should have become King.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account