The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
Henry intended that his son’s uncle, Lord Hertford, Queen Jane
Seymour’s brother, should be his sole guardian, and for a wretched
pretext Norfolk and Surrey were arrested, imprisoned in the Tower,
and sentenced to death. Of the Duke of Norfolk, Sir Walter Raleigh
wrote in the preface to his great History: “Henry knew not how to
value his deservings, having never omitted anything that concerned his
own honour and the King’s service.” Despite his weakness for tears,
Norfolk may rank amongst the English worthies, for he had done good
service to the State, both in arms and council. He had commanded the
English army at the Battle of Flodden, and had led another army during
a second victorious war in Scotland; he had also led the English van in
the war with France. In Ireland he had been one of the best and most
just of the English Lords-Deputy. By the accident of birth the Duke
was of the blood-royal, being descended from the Mowbrays; further
than this, he had married one of the daughters of Edward IV., and two
of his nieces had been Queens of England. For his own safety he was
perilously near the steps of the throne, and his birth was too high,
the story of his life too romantic, for Henry to tolerate his surviving
himself, consequently, with reason or without, his death was determined
upon; Henry was never troubled by lack of just cause. The dying King
excused his treatment of the Duke and his son Surrey to foreign courts,
by giving out that they had conspired to take upon themselves the
government of the State; this was a pure invention. Another and a
still more ridiculous charge brought against them was that Norfolk and
his son had quartered in their shield the royal arms of Edward the
Confessor. This charge could not have hoodwinked the most simple, for
it had been the custom of the Duke’s family long before he himself was
born to have these arms quartered upon their shield. However, on the
14th of January 1547, the House of Lords, without even the form of a
trial, and without examining either the Duke or his son, passed a bill
of attainder against them, and the end of the month was fixed for their
execution.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account