The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
Until the reign of Edward the Third the records of the Tower are
miserably meagre and scanty. It would require a far more imaginative
mind than I possess to infuse any life or movement or interest into
them. It has been my humble intention merely to narrate in this work
what is of undoubted authority as regards the history of the Tower,
and were I even capable of adding colour to the dry chronicles of
historical fact in these pages, it would be distasteful to me to try
to enhance the interest of this narrative by setting down that which
I have no good evidence for regarding as strictly true; or to attempt
to adorn the dry facts, which the old chroniclers have given us, by
imaginary incidents and tales for which there is no better evidence
than that coming from the author’s imagination. An historical novel
such as that most entertaining work the “Tower of London,” by Harrison
Ainsworth, is a delightful effort of the writer’s imagination; but
a book which professes to be a history must not be a hotch-potch of
truth and fiction. That would be the worst of literary frauds. Feeling
strongly on this matter, I must beg my readers to pardon the dulness of
my records relating to the early history of the Tower, but I can assure
them that what I have written is, as far as possible, accurate history;
and, at the same time, beg them not to be disappointed if they find no
flights of fancy in these pages.
RONALD SUTHERLAND GOWER.
ERRATUM.
The illustration at page 198 represents the Byward Tower,
not Middle Tower.
[Illustration: _The Tower of London_
(_From a Sketch by H. Colls._)]
THE TOWER
CHAPTER I
THE BUILDINGS
Nothing has come down to us of any authentic value regarding ancient
London until Tacitus writes of Londinium as a place celebrated for the
numbers of its merchants and the confluence of traffic. In the days of
the Roman occupation St Albans, then called Verolanium, was a far more
important place than Roman Londinium; and, perhaps, it was Verolanium
whereto Cæsar marched in his second descent on Britain in B.C. 54, and
which he described as a place “protected by woods and marshes.” Such
a description would equally apply to Londinium, and, for aught we can
know to the contrary, the town Cæsar describes as being surrounded by
woods and marshes may have been our capital.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account