The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
In the days of our first Norman kings, a single square tower or keep,
usually situated on a hill surrounded by an artificial ditch or moat,
was considered sufficient protection. One might give a long list of
such towers or keeps both in England and Normandy, for William the
First, not content with overawing the Londoners with his great tower
in their city, built others at Dover and at Exeter, at Nottingham and
at York, at Lincoln and at Durham, at Cambridge and at Huntingdon.
Under Duke Rollo and his immediate successors the Normans built their
fortresses by the side of navigable rivers, on islands, or near the
sea, since these fortresses were not merely destined as defences, but
also for places of safety. They were, in fact, places of refuge for
the people of the surrounding country, who fled to them with all their
possessions, and particularly their live stock, at the approach of an
enemy. By their situation, safety, if necessary, could be obtained by
taking flight on the neighbouring river or sea.
In Normandy—at Fécamp, at Eu, at Bayeux, at Jumiége, and at Oisel, to
name but a few of these Norman keeps—this custom obtained. At Rouen,
as in London, the principal fortress built by the Norman duke stood
by the riverside, and not on the hills at the back of the town. None
of these places mentioned above were stronger or more imposing than
the great Norman keep in London, known for centuries as the White
Tower, receiving that title at first, probably from the whiteness of
its stone, and in later times from the continued coatings of whitewash
which it received. Of the many castles in Normandy and Touraine of the
same period as the White Tower, that of Loches resembles it most nearly
in size and form. Loches is now almost a ruin, as are most of the
Conqueror’s castles, but the great White Tower remains intact despite
the storms, sieges, and fires through which it has passed during eight
centuries. It is still the Arx Palatina of London and of the British
Empire.
Although in situation the Tower cannot compare with such grandly-placed
castles as Dover or Bamborough, Conway or Carnarvon, or vie in beauty
of scenery with Warwick or Windsor, it remains the most historic
building in our land; not even the mausoleum fortress of Hadrian in old
Rome can compete in interest with the Norman fortress—palace—and State
prison of London; Edinburgh Castle alone approaches it as regards its
influence on the history of the capital it defended, for the northern
fortress was also the home of its national sovereigns for centuries,
its country’s chief prison, the store-house of its regalia, and its
city’s strong place of defence; and, like the Tower, it has been
guarded from its foundation up to the present time without a break, by
its country’s armed defenders.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account