The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 1 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
Three years later, the Tower witnessed brighter scenes. Froissart
tells us in his inimitable manner of a splendid tournament held in
Smithfield, and commencing with a State procession which left the
Tower, and in which the King, his Queen, and the whole Court presented
an imposing sight. But Richard was biding his time to avenge the
death of his old friend Burley, and these brave shows and festivities
were only used as a cloak for designs he had meditated carrying out
from the day of Burley’s execution by his rebel subjects. The time
at length arrived—in 1396. His “good Queen,” Anne of Bavaria, was
dead, and Richard had taken as his second wife and Queen, Isabel of
France—daughter of the mad King Charles—who was lodged in the palace at
the Tower until her coronation. In the following year (1397) Richard
obtained his revenge.
This was a _coup d’état_—I have the authority of Mr Gardiner for using
the French term—by which he summarily arrested his uncle Gloucester,
with the Earls of Warwick and Arundel. The shrift of these enemies of
the King was a short one. The Duke of Gloucester[7] was taken to the
Castle of Calais, and there he died, probably by the King’s orders; the
Earl of Warwick had received an invitation to meet the King at dinner
at the palace of the Lord Chancellor, Edmund de Strafford, who was
also Bishop of Exeter, which was in the Strand, near Temple Bar, with
gardens running down to the river. When the dinner was ended, Warwick,
on rising to take leave, was arrested, hurried to a barge, rowed up to
the fortress, and placed in the tower which bore his family name. After
a time, he was removed from the Beauchamp Tower to the castle rock of
Tintagel in Cornwall, and thence to the Isle of Man, the King sparing
his life, probably because of the public indignation that would have
been roused by the execution of one who had, more than any other of the
great nobles of his day, distinguished himself so highly in the French
wars.
Arundel was brought to trial, pleading not guilty, and offering to
prove his innocence of the charges brought against him by the ordeal
of battle. No mercy, however, was shown him, and he was beheaded the
same day that his sentence was pronounced. His death was lamented by
many who knew his worth; he was a gallant soldier, and ten years before
this fate befell him had commanded an English fleet which had defeated
a French one. He was one of the greatest sons of the most illustrious
house in the kingdom, and his prowess on land was as renowned as his
success upon the sea.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account