The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
Sir Walter Raleigh died a martyr to the cause of a Greater Britain; his
life thrown as a sop to the Spanish Cerberus by the most debased and
ignoble of our kings. Raleigh’s faults were undoubtedly many, but his
great qualities, his superb courage, his devotion to his country, his
faith in the future greatness of England, were infinitely greater, and
outweighed a thousand times all his failings. The onus of the guilt of
his death—a judicial murder if ever there was one—must be borne by the
base councillors who truckled to the King, and by the King himself who,
Judas-like, sold Raleigh to Spain.
Some less interesting State prisoners occupied the Tower towards
the close of the inglorious reign of James Stuart. Among these were
Gervase, Lord Clifford, imprisoned for threatening the Lord Keeper
in 1617. Clifford committed suicide in the Tower in the following
year. About the same time, Sir Thomas Luke, one of the Secretaries of
State, and his daughter, were imprisoned in the Tower on the charge
of insulting Lady Exeter, whom they accused of incest and witchcraft,
but, whether the charges were true or false, they were soon liberated.
James’s court seems to have combined all the vices, for Lord and Lady
Suffolk were also prisoners in the fortress about the same time,
accused of bribery and corruption.
To the Tower also were sent the two great lawyers—Lord Chancellor
Bacon, and Sir Edward Coke—the former for having received bribes, the
latter for the part he had taken in supporting the privileges of the
House of Commons. Here, also, two noble lords, the Earl of Arundel
and Lord Spencer, were in durance, owing to a quarrel between them in
the House of Lords, when Arundel had insulted Spencer by telling him
that at no distant time back his ancestors had been engaged in tending
sheep, to which Lord Spencer responded: “When my ancestors were keeping
sheep, yours were plotting treason.” The dispute seems scarcely of
sufficient importance to have sent both disputants to the Tower.
In 1622 the Earl of Oxford and Robert Philip, together with some
members of Parliament, were sent to the fortress for objecting too
publicly to the suggested marriage of the Prince of Wales, afterwards
Charles I., with a Spanish princess; and the Earl of Bristol was also
in the Tower for matters connected with the same projected alliance.
It was not always safe to have an opinion of one’s own under James the
First.
The last State prisoner of mark to be sent to the Tower in James’s
reign was Lionel Cranfield, Earl of Middlesex, who had been found
guilty of receiving bribes in his official capacity as Lord High
Treasurer.
CHAPTER XIII
CHARLES I. AND THE COMMONWEALTH
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account