The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
“Have no confidence in such
reports; sand was the best material on which they rested, and the many
fancies of the multitude; unless they pointed at that kind of libertie,
‘libertie of mynde.’ But other libertie I know not, having so little
interest in her masters that I expect no service from her.” His prison
was frequently changed, and many restraints were put upon him, for,
on the 26th of December, he writes to his old friend, the famous John
Hampden, that his lodgings have been moved. “I am now,” he says, “where
candle-light may be suffered, but scarce fire. None but my servants,
hardly my sonne, may have admittance to me; my friends I must desire
for their own sake to forbear coming to the Tower.” Poor Eliot was
dying fast in the year 1632, but his last letter to Hampden, dated the
22nd of March, is full of his old brave spirit, and the gentle humour
that distinguished this great and good man. The letter concludes thus:
“Great is the authority of princes, but greater much is theirs who both
command our persons and our will. What the success of their Government
will be must be referred to Him that is master of their power.” The
doctor had informed the authorities that any fresh air and exercise
would help Eliot to live, but all the air they gave him was a “smoky
room,” and all the exercise, a few steps on the platform of a wall.
On the 27th of November Eliot died, “not without a suspicion of foul
play,” wrote Ludlow some years afterwards.
[Illustration: _The Byward Tower_]
Eliot’s staunch friends, Pym and Hampden, moved in the House for a
committee “to examine after what manner Sir John Eliot came to his
death, his usage in the Tower, and to view the rooms and place where he
was imprisoned and where he died, and to report the same to the House,”
a motion which shows how matters had changed for the better since the
days of Elizabeth, none of whose Parliaments would have dared thus to
question the treatment of State prisoners.
The blame of his untimely death—for he was but forty-two—rests upon
those who let him die by inches in his prison as much as if they had
beheaded him on Tower Hill. John Eliot died a martyr in the cause of
constitutional liberty as opposed to monarchical autocracy. Eliot’s son
petitioned the King to be allowed to remove his father’s body to their
old Cornish home at St Germains, but the vindictive and narrow-minded
monarch, who would not even forgive Eliot after death had intervened,
refused the prayer, writing at the foot of the petition, “Lett Sir John
Eliot’s body be buried in the church of the parish where he died.” No
stone marks the spot where he is buried, and his dust mingles with
that of the illustrious dead in St Peter’s Chapel in the Tower, but his
name will be remembered as long as liberty is loved in his native land.
We now come to a period of quite another sort.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account