The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
History
The Tower of London, (Vol. 2 of 2)
Gower, Ronald Sutherland, Lord
Tower of London (London, England)
Jeffreys was only forty years old when he was taken to the Tower, but
he soon wasted away, tormented, one might imagine, by the spectres of
those whom he had destroyed, and of the thousands whom he had made
desolate. Whether he died from drinking brandy to excess or not, is of
little moment, but according to Oldnixon, his body “continued to decay”
until the 19th of April 1689, when he died at the age of forty-one.
He had been Chief-Justice at thirty-five, and Lord Chancellor at
thirty-seven. No one looking at his portrait in the National Portrait
Gallery would imagine that the melancholy-looking and distinguished
young man, with his long, flowing wig, could be the most cruel,
vindictive, and unmerciful judge with whom the English Bench has ever
been cursed.
[Illustration: _de k: vhicht by nacht uyt het hof met de seegels vant
Rÿck:_]
CHAPTER XVI
WILLIAM AND MARY
Only one prisoner of State suffered death during the twelve years of
the joint reigns of William of Orange and Mary. This was Sir John
Fenwick, who had been implicated in a plot to assassinate William, and
being found guilty of high treason, was beheaded on Tower Hill on 28th
January 1697.
There were, however, a number of more or less unfortunate important
State prisoners at different times in the fortress, the most
interesting of these being the future Duke of Marlborough, for
“abetting and adhering to their Majesties’ enemies.” In Lord Wolseley’s
admirable history of that great soldier’s life, we read under the date
of 5th May 1697: “Marlborough was kept a close prisoner in the Tower,
no one being allowed to see him except by order of the Secretary of
State. His wife left the Princess Anne at Sion House in order to be
near him in town, and she left no means untried to obtain his release.
There still exist many orders signed by Lord Nottingham granting her
permission to see him in prison, the earliest being dated five days
after his committal, and worded ‘for this time only.’ A Mr Chudleigh
was a frequent visitor; the first order of admission given him was to
see Marlborough in presence of a warder, ‘for this time only.’ Later
on, we find an order addressed to Lord Lucas, the Constable of the
Tower, signifying the Queen’s pleasure that friends and relatives of
the prisoners lately committed should have access to them from time
to time. They were subsequently allowed to dine together, when all
dread of invasion had passed away. Marlborough, in the Tower, had
fewer friends than ever, but his wife makes honourable mention of Lord
Bradford, who not only refused to sign the warrant which committed
him to prison, but paid him a visit when there.... Writing to Lady
Marlborough, Princess Anne says: ‘I hear Lord Marlborough is sent to
the Tower, and though I am certain they have nothing against him, and
expected by your letter it would be so, yet I was struck when I was
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account