The Town: Its Memorable Characters and EventsHunt, Leigh
History
The Town: Its Memorable Characters and Events
Hunt, Leigh
London (England) -- Description and travel; London (England) -- History
"Two young women from Staffordshire visited him when I was
present, to consult him on the subject of Methodism, to which
they were inclined. 'Come (said he), you pretty fools, dine
with Maxwell and me at the Mitre, and we will talk over that
subject'; which they did, and after dinner he took one of them
on his knees, and fondled them for half an hour together."[115]
This anecdote is exquisite. It shows, that however impatient he was of
having his own superstitions canvassed, he was loth to see them
inflicted on others. He is here a harmless Falstaff, with two innocent
damsels on his knees, in lieu of Mesdames Ford and Page.
In Gough Square, Johnson wrote part of his Dictionary. He had written
the Rambler and taken his high stand with the public before. "At this
time," says Barber, his servant, "he had little for himself, but
frequently sent money to Mr. Shiels when in distress." (Shiels was one
of his amanuenses in the dictionary.) His friends and visitors in
Gough Square are a good specimen of what they always were--a
miscellany creditable to the largeness of his humanity. There was
Cave, Dr. Hawkesworth, Miss Carter, Mrs. Macauley (two ladies who must
have looked strangely at one another), Mr. (afterwards Sir Joshua)
Reynolds, Langton, Mrs. Williams (a poor poetess whom he maintained in
his house), Mr. Levett (an apothecary on the same footing), Garrick,
Lord Orrery, Lord Southwell, and Mrs. Gardiner, wife of a tallow
chandler on Snow-hill--"not in the learned way," said Mr. Barber, "but
a worthy good woman." With all his respect for rank, which doubtless
he regarded as a special dispensation of Providence, his friend
Beauclerk's notwithstanding,[116] Johnson never lost sight of the
dignity of goodness. He did not, however, confine his attentions to
those who were noble or amiable; though we are to suppose, that
everybody with whom he chose to be conversant had some good quality or
other; unless, indeed, he patronised them as the Duke of Montague did
his ugly dogs, because nobody would if he did not. The great secret,
no doubt, was, that he was glad of the company of any of his
fellow-creatures who would bear and forbear with him, and for whose
tempers he did not care as much as he did for their welfare. And he
was giving alms; which was a catholic part of religion, in the proper
sense of the word.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account