According to this scientist, the complex molecule of albuminoid
substances is constituted by a fixed central nucleus, and by a number
of lateral chains or receptors, fixed to this nucleus, which possess
diverse accessory functions, and which serve, particularly, for the
nutrition of the cells. These receptors have a great affinity for the
various substances necessary for the support of the living elements,
and they seize upon the alimentary substances, in normal life, just as
a leaf of the _Dionæa_ seizes a fly which serves as its food.
In these special conditions the receptors may attach themselves to
the complex molecules of albuminoid substances, such as the different
toxins.
Ehrlich supposes, as we have already seen, that a toxin contains two
special groups--a _toxophore_ group, which poisons, and a _haptophore_
group, which combines with the receptor. According to this theory,
the toxophore group of a toxin can act on an organism _only_ when the
haptophore group of the toxin encounters a suitable attachment or
receptor.
The receptors attached to the living protoplasmic molecule attract the
toxin, just as a lightning-rod attracts the lightning.
It is hence clearly proved that the toxigenic poisons exert their
noxious action on the cellular elements of sensitive organisms, by
entering into combination with these.
Experience has shown that they attach themselves, in a most rigorously
elective manner, to the tissues, and rapidly disappear from the general
circulation. Numerous facts, clearly established, attest the reality of
this fixation or attachment.
It is thus that von Behring and Wernicke[33] sought to ascertain
the quantity of antitoxin (we will see farther on that this name is
given to those substances which neutralize the activity of toxins
under certain conditions) which, introduced a certain time after the
introduction of the poison, will save the life of the animal. They
have experimented with diphtheria toxin, which we will study later,
and they have demonstrated that, if the antitoxic serum be introduced
immediately after the toxin, a dose of antitoxin twice as large as that
of the toxin suffices to effect a cure.
[33] VON BEHRING and WERNICKE: Zeitschrift für Hygiene, XII.
Eight hours after the administration of the toxin the dose must be
trebled, while after thirty-six hours it is necessary to have recourse
to a quantity of antitoxin eight times as great. These experiments
show that the curative action of the antitoxin is so much the less the
longer the period of time that has elapsed between the introduction
of the toxin and the antitoxin. This is because the toxin has become
so intimately attached to the tissues that the antitoxin introduced
has not the power to destroy the combination. These facts have been
confirmed by Donitz[34] and by the classic experiments of Decroly and
Rousse.[35]
[34] DONITZ: Ueber die Grenzen der Wirksamkeit des Diphtheria
Heilserums. _Deutsche Med. Woch._, No. 27, 1897.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account