English fiction -- 20th century; Short stories, English
“Do you mean people who disagree on matters of political opinion and
religious views?” asked Lena.
“No, not that. The broader lines of political or religious difference
don’t matter. You can have Church of England and Unitarian and Buddhist
under the same roof without courting disaster; the only Buddhist I ever
had down here quarrelled with everybody, but that was on account of his
naturally squabblesome temperament; it had nothing to do with his
religion. And I’ve always found that people can differ profoundly about
politics and meet on perfectly good terms at breakfast. Now, Miss Larbor
Jones, who was staying here last year, worships Lloyd George as a sort of
wingless angel, while Mrs. Walters, who was down here at the same time,
privately considers him to be—an antelope, let us say.”
“An antelope?”
“Well, not an antelope exactly, but something with horns and hoofs and
tail.”
“Oh, I see.”
“Still, that didn’t prevent them from being the chummiest of mortals on
the tennis court and in the billiard-room. They did quarrel finally,
about a lead in a doubled hand of no-trumps, but that of course is a
thing that no account of judicious guest-grouping could prevent. Mrs.
Walters had got king, knave, ten, and seven of clubs—”
“You were saying that there were other lines of demarcation that caused
the bother,” interrupted Lena.
“Exactly. It is the minor differences and side-issues that give so much
trouble,” said Lady Prowche; “not to my dying day shall I forget last
year’s upheaval over the Suffragette question. Laura Henniseed left the
house in a state of speechless indignation, but before she had reached
that state she had used language that would not have been tolerated in
the Austrian Reichsrath. Intensive bear-gardening was Sir Richard’s
description of the whole affair, and I don’t think he exaggerated.”
“Of course the Suffragette question is a burning one, and lets loose the
most dreadful ill-feeling,” said Lena; “but one can generally find out
beforehand what people’s opinions—”
“My dear, the year before it was worse. It was Christian Science.
Selina Goobie is a sort of High Priestess of the Cult, and she put down
all opposition with a high hand. Then one evening, after dinner, Clovis
Sangrail put a wasp down her back, to see if her theory about the
non-existence of pain could be depended on in an emergency. The wasp was
small, but very efficient, and it had been soured in temper by being kept
in a paper cage all the afternoon. Wasps don’t stand confinement well,
at least this one didn’t. I don’t think I ever realised till that moment
what the word ‘invective’ could be made to mean. I sometimes wake in the
night and think I still hear Selina describing Clovis’s conduct and
general character. That was the year that Sir Richard was writing his
volume on ‘Domestic Life in Tartary.’ The critics all blamed it for a
lack of concentration.”
“He’s engaged on a very important work this year, isn’t he?” asked Lena.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account