The Traditional Games of England, Scotland, and Ireland (Vol 1 of 2): With Tunes, Singing-Rhymes and Methods of Playing etc.Gomme, Alice Bertha
History
The Traditional Games of England, Scotland, and Ireland (Vol 1 of 2): With Tunes, Singing-Rhymes and Methods of Playing etc.
Gomme, Alice Bertha
Folklore -- Great Britain; Games -- Great Britain
—R. S. Baker (_Northants Notes and Queries_, ii. 161).
(_b_) One couple is chosen to lead, and they go off, whither they will,
followed by a long train of youths and maidens, all singing the refrain.
Sometimes the leaders part company, and branch off to the right or left;
the others have to do the same, and not until the leaders meet can they
join again. They march arm in arm.
(_c_) Mr. R. S. Baker, who records this, says a Wellingborough lady sent
him the tune and words, and told him the game was more like a country
dance than anything else, being a sort of dancing “Follow My Leader.”
Gully
A sink, or, failing that, a particular stone in the pavement was the
“Gully.” Some boy chosen by lot, or one who volunteered in order to
start the game, laid his top on the ground at some distance from the
“Gully.” The first player then spun his top, pegging at the recumbent
top, so as to draw it towards the “Gully.” If he missed the top, he
stooped down and took up his own top by pushing his hand against it in
such a manner that the space between his first and second finger caught
against the peg and forced the top into the palm of his hand. He then
had “a go” at the recumbent top (I forget what this was called), and
sent his own top against it so as to push it towards the “Gully.” If he
missed, he tried again and again, until his own top could spin no
longer. If he did not hit the top with his own while it was spinning,
his top had to be laid down and the other one taken up, and its owner
took his turn at pegging. When a spinning-top showed signs of
exhaustion, and the taking it up might kill it, and it was not very far
from the down-lying top, its owner would gently push it with his finger,
so as to make it touch the other top, and so avoid putting it into the
other’s place. This was called “kissing,” and was not allowed by some
players. When one player succeeded in sending the top into the “Gully,”
he took it up and fixed it by its peg into a post, mortar of a wall, or
the best place where it could be tolerably steady. Holding it by one
hand, he drove the peg of his own top as far as he could into the crown
of the victim top. This was called “taking a grudge.” He then held
either his own or the victim top and knocked the other against the wall,
the object being to split the victim. He was allowed three “grudges.” If
the top did not give way, the other players tried in turn. If the top
did not split, it was returned to its owner, but any boy who succeeded
in splitting it through the middle, so that the peg fell out, took
possession of the peg. I have seen a top split at the side in such a way
as to be quite useless as a top, though no peg was gained. I remember,
too, a schoolfellow of mine drawing from his pocket some seven or eight
pegs, the trophied memorials of as many tops.—London (J. P. Emslie).
See “Hoatie,” “Hoges,” “Peg-top.”
Hairry my Bossie
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account