"these elements: So again, "Within the bowels of THESE elements," &c., on p. 87, first col,--"THESE" being equivalent to THE. (Not unfrequently in our old writers THESE is little more than redundant.)" ] [Footnote 13: enterprise: So 4to 1616.--2tos 1624, 1631, "enterprises."] [Footnote 14: make swift Rhine circle fair: So 4to 1616.--2tos 1624, 1631, "WITH swift Rhine circle ALL."] [Footnote 15: silk: Old eds. "skill."] [Footnote 16: blest: So 4to 1616.--2tos 1624, 1631, "wise."] [Footnote 17: Swarm: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--2to 1616 "Sworne."] [Footnote 18: to: So 4to 1616.--Not in 4tos 1624, 1631.] [Footnote 19: have: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--2to 1616 "has."] [Footnote 20: shall they: So 4to 1616.--2tos 1624, 1631, "they shall."] [Footnote 21: huge: So 4to 1616.--2tos 1624, 1631, "whole."] [Footnote 22: stuffs: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--2to 1616 "stuff'd."] [Footnote 23: renowm'd: So 4to 1616 (See note ||, p. 11).--2tos 1624, 1631, "renown'd." Note ||, from p. 11. (The First Part of Tamburlaine the Great): "renowmed: i.e. renowned.--So the 8vo.--The 4to "renowned." --The form "RENOWMED" (Fr. RENOMME) occurs repeatedly afterwards in this play, according to the 8vo. It is occasionally found in writers posterior to Marlowe's time. e.g. "Of Constantines great towne RENOUM'D in vaine." Verses to King James, prefixed to Lord Stirling's MONARCHICKE TRAGEDIES, ed. 1607." ] [Footnote 24: Albertus': Old eds. "Albanus."] [Footnote 25: that: So 4tos 1616, 1624.--2to 1631 "the."] [Footnote 26: him: So 4to 1616.--Not in 4tos 1624, 1631.] [Footnote 27: Enter Faustus: Old eds. "Thunder. Enter Lucifer and 4 deuils, Faustus to them with this speech,"--wrongly.] [Footnote 28: her: So 4to 1616.--2tos 1624, 1631, "his."] [Footnote 29: erring: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--2to 1616 "euening."] [Footnote 30: Mephistophilis Dragon, quod tumeraris: See note *, p. 83. Note *, from p. 83. (Doctor Faustus, from the quarto of 1604): "surgat Mephistophilis, quod tumeraris: The later 4tos have "surgat Mephistophilis DRAGON, quod tumeraris."--There is a corruption here, which seems to defy emendation. For "quod TUMERARIS," Mr. J. Crossley, of Manchester, would read (rejecting the word "Dragon") "quod TU MANDARES" (the construction being "quod tu mandares ut Mephistophilis appareat et surgat"): but the "tu" does not agree with the preceding "vos."--The Revd. J. Mitford proposes "surgat Mephistophilis, per Dragon (or Dagon) quod NUMEN EST AERIS."" ] [Footnote 31: dicatus: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--2to 1616 "dicatis."] [Footnote 32: came hither: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--2to 1616 "came NOW hether."] [Footnote 33: speeches: So 4to 1604.--Not in the later 4tos.] [Footnote 34: accidens: So 4tos 1624, 1631.--2to 1616 "accident."] [Footnote 35: fell: So 4to 1604.--The later 4tos "liue."]