Asia -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; Mongols -- History; Polo, Marco, 1254-1323?; Voyages and travels
Nothing better expresses Yule’s feeling in the period referred to
than the following letter, written in reference to the R. E. Gordon
Memorial,[72] but of much wider application: “Will you allow me an inch
or two of space to say to my brother officers, ‘Have nothing to do with
the proposed Gordon Memorial.’
“That glorious memory is in no danger of perishing and needs no
memorial. Sackcloth and silence are what it suggests to those who
have guided the action of England; and Englishmen must bear the
responsibility for that action and share its shame. It is too early for
atoning memorials; nor is it possible for those who take part in them
to dissociate themselves from a repulsive hypocrisy.
“Let every one who would fain bestow something in honour of the great
victim, do, in silence, some act of help to our soldiers or their
families, or to others who are poor and suffering.
“In later days our survivors or successors may look back with softened
sorrow and pride to the part which men of our corps have played in
these passing events, and Charles Gordon far in the front of all; and
then they may set up our little tablets, or what not—not to preserve
the memory of our heroes, but to maintain the integrity of our own
record of the illustrious dead.”
Happily Yule lived to see the beginning of better times for his
country. One of the first indications of that national awakening was
the right spirit in which the public, for the most part, received Lord
Wolseley’s stirring appeal at the close of 1888, and Yule was so much
struck by the parallelism between Lord Wolseley’s warning and some
words of his own contained in the pseudo-Polo fragment (see above, end
of Preface), that he sent Lord Wolseley the very last copy of the 1875
edition of _Marco Polo_, with a vigorous expression of his sentiments.
That was probably Yule’s last utterance on a public question. The sands
of life were now running low, and in the spring of 1889, he felt it
right to resign his seat on the India Council, to which he had been
appointed for life. On this occasion Lord Cross, then Secretary of
State for India, successfully urged his acceptance of the K.C.S.I.,
which Yule had refused several years before.
In the House of Lords, Viscount Cross subsequently referred to his
resignation in the following terms. He said: “A vacancy on the Council
had unfortunately occurred through the resignation from ill-health of
Sir Henry Yule, whose presence on the Council had been of enormous
advantage to the natives of the country. A man of more kindly
disposition, thorough intelligence, high-minded, upright, honourable
character, he believed did not exist; and he would like to bear
testimony to the estimation in which he was held, and to the services
which he had rendered in the office he had so long filled.”[73]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account