Asia -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; Mongols -- History; Polo, Marco, 1254-1323?; Voyages and travels
We are obliged, indeed, to give up the attempt to keep to a line of
communicating rivers throughout the whole 24 days. Nor do I see how
it is possible to adhere to that condition literally without taking
more material liberties with the text.
[Illustration: MARCO POLO’S ITINERARIES Nᵒ. V.
Indo Chinese Regions (Book II, Chapˢ. 44–59)]
My theory of Polo’s actual journey would be that he returned from
Yun-nan fu to Ch’êng-tu fu through some part of the province of
Kwei-chau, perhaps only its western extremity, but that he spoke of
Caugigu, and probably of Anin, as he did of Bangala, from report
only. And, in recapitulation, I would identify provisionally the
localities spoken of in this difficult itinerary as follows:
_Caugigu_ with Kiang Hung; _Anin_ with Homi; _Coloman_ with the
country about Wei-ning in Western Kwei-chau; _Fungul_ or Sinugul
with Siu-chau.
[This itinerary is difficult, as Sir Henry Yule says. It takes
Marco Polo 24 days to go from Coloman or Toloman to Ch’êng-tu. The
land route is 22 days from Yun-nan fu to Swi-fu, _viâ_ Tung-ch’wan
and Chao-t’ung. (_J. China B. R. A. S._ XXVIII. 74–75.) From the
Toloman province, which I place about Lin-ngan and Cheng-kiang,
south of Yun-nan fu, Polo must have passed a second time through
this city, which is indeed at the end of all the routes of this
part of South-Western China. He might go back to Sze-ch’wan by the
western route, _viâ_ Tung-ch’wan and Chao-t’ung to Swi-fu, or, by
the eastern, easier and shorter route by Siuen-wei chau, crossing
a corner of the Kwei-chau province (Wei-ning), and passing by
Yun-ning hien to the Kiang; this is the route followed by Mr. A.
Hosie in 1883 and by Mr. F. S. A. Bourne in 1885, and with great
likelihood by Marco Polo; he may have taken the Yun-ning River to
the district city of Na-ch’i hien, which lies on the right bank
both of this river and of the Kiang; the Kiang up to Swi-fu and
thence to Ch’êng-tu. I do not attempt to explain the difficulty
about Fungul.
I fully agree with Sir H. Yule when he says that Polo spoke of
Caugigu and of Bangala, probably of Anin, from report only.
However, I believe that Caugigu is the _Kiao-Chi kwé_ of the
Chinese, that Ani_n_ must be read Ani_u_, that Aniu is but
a transcription of _Nan-yué_, that both Nan-yué and Kiao-Chi
represent Northern Annam, _i.e._ the portion of Annam which we call
Tung-king. Regarding the tattooed inhabitants of Caugigu, let it be
remembered that tattooing existed in Annam till it was prohibited
by the Chinese during the occupation of Tung-king at the beginning
of the 15th century.—H. C.]
NOTE 7.—Here the traveller gets back to the road-bifurcation near
Juju, _i.e._ Chochau (_ante_ p. 11), and thence commences to travel
southward.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account