Asia -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; Mongols -- History; Polo, Marco, 1254-1323?; Voyages and travels
NOTE 9.—The estuary of the Ts’ien T’ang, or river of Hang-chau,
has undergone great changes since Polo’s day. The sea now comes up
much nearer the city; and the upper part of the Bay of Hang-chau is
believed to cover what was once the site of the port and town of
KANP’U, the Ganpu of the text. A modern representative of the name
still subsists, a walled town, and one of the depôts for the salt
which is so extensively manufactured on this coast; but the present
port of Hang-chau, and till recently the sole seat of Chinese
trade with Japan, is at _Chapu_, some 20 miles further seaward.
It is supposed by Klaproth that KANP’U was the port frequented by
the early Arab voyagers, and of which they speak under the name of
_Khánfú_, confounding in their details Hang-chau itself with the
port. Neumann dissents from this, maintaining that the Khanfu of
the Arabs was certainly Canton. Abulfeda, however, states expressly
that Khanfu was known in his day as _Khansá_ (_i.e._ Kinsay),
and he speaks of its lake of fresh water called _Sikhu_ (Si-hu).
[Abulfeda has in fact two Khânqû (Khanfû): Khansâ with the lake
which is Kinsay, and one Khanfû which is probably Canton. (See
_Guyard’s transl._, II., ii., 122–124.)—H. C.] There seems to be an
indication in Chinese records that a southern branch of the Great
Kiang once entered the sea at Kanp’u; the closing of it is assigned
to the 7th century, or a little later.
[Dr. F. Hirth writes (_Jour. Roy. As. Soc._, 1896, pp. 68–69): “For
centuries Canton must have been the only channel through which
foreign trade was permitted; for it is not before the year 999 that
we read of the appointment of Inspectors of Trade at Hang-chou
and Ming-chou. The latter name is identified with Ning-po.” Dr.
Hirth adds in a note: “This is in my opinion the principal reason
why the port of _Khanfu_, mentioned by the earliest Muhammadan
travellers, or authors (Soleiman, Abu Zeid, and Maçoudi), cannot
be identified with Hang-chou. The report of Soleiman, who first
speaks of _Khanfu_, was written in 851, and in those days Canton
was apparently the only port open to foreign trade. Marco Polo’s
_Ganfu_ is a different port altogether, viz. _Kan-fu_, or _Kan-pu_,
near Hang-chou, and should not be confounded with _Khanfu_.”—H. C.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account