Asia -- Description and travel -- Early works to 1800; Mongols -- History; Polo, Marco, 1254-1323?; Voyages and travels
NOTE 4.—These tattooing artists were probably employed mainly
by mariners frequenting the port. We do not know if the Malays
practised tattooing before their conversion to Islam. But most
Indo-Chinese races tattoo, and the Japanese still “have the greater
part of the body and limbs scrolled over with bright-blue dragons,
and lions, and tigers, and figures of men and women tattooed into
their skins with the most artistic and elaborate ornamentation.”
(_Alcock_, I. 191.) Probably the Arab sailors also indulged in the
same kind of decoration. It is common among the Arab women now, and
Della Valle speaks of it as in his time so much in vogue among both
sexes through Egypt, Arabia, and Babylonia, that _he_ had not been
able to escape. (I. 395.)
NOTE 5.—The divergence in Ramusio’s version is here very notable:
“The River which enters the Port of Zayton is great and wide,
running with great velocity, and is a branch of that which flows
by the city of Kinsay. And at the place where it quits the main
channel is the city of Tingui, of which all that is to be said is
that there they make porcelain basins and dishes. The manner of
making porcelain was thus related to him. They excavate a certain
kind of earth, as it were from a mine, and this they heap into
great piles, and then leave it undisturbed and exposed to wind,
rain, and sun for 30 or 40 years. In this space of time the earth
becomes sufficiently refined for the manufacture of porcelain; they
then colour it at their discretion, and bake it in a furnace. Those
who excavate the clay do so always therefore for their sons and
grandsons. The articles are so cheap in that city that you get 8
bowls for a Venice groat.”
Ibn Batuta speaks of porcelain as manufactured at Zayton; indeed he
says positively (and wrongly): “Porcelain is made nowhere in China
except in the cities of Zaitun and Sinkalan” (Canton). A good
deal of China ware in modern times _is_ made in Fo-kien and Canton
provinces, and it is still an article of export from T’swan-chau
and Amoy; but it is only of a very ordinary kind. Pakwiha, between
Amoy and Chang-chau, is mentioned in the _Chinese Commercial
Guide_ (p. 114) as now the place where the coarse blue ware, so
largely exported to India, etc., is largely manufactured; and
Phillips mentions Tung-’an (about half-way between T’swan-chau and
Chang-chau) as a great seat of this manufacture.
Looking, however, to the Ramusian interpolations, which do not
indicate a locality necessarily near Zayton, or even in Fo-kien, it
is possible that Murray is right in supposing the place intended
_in these_ to be really _King-tê chên_ in Kiang-si, the great seat
of the manufacture of genuine porcelain, or rather its chief mart
JAU-CHAU FU on the P’o-yang Lake.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account