The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of ConstantineValla, Lorenzo
History
The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of Constantine
Valla, Lorenzo
Church and state -- Holy Roman Empire; Constitutum Constantini; Popes -- Temporal power -- Early works to 1800
I pass over the fact that in saying “a city should be built” [he uses
the word for “the state” instead of “the city”], and cities, not states,
are built; and the fact that he says “the province of Byzantia.”[493]
If you are Constantine, give the reason why you should choose that as
the best place for founding your city. For that you should “transfer”
yourself elsewhere after giving up Rome, was not so much “fitting” as
necessary. You should neither call yourself Emperor when you have lost
Rome and deserved least from the Roman name whose meaning you destroy;
nor call yourself “royal,” for no one before you has done so,—unless you
call yourself a king because you have ceased to be a Roman.[494] But you
allege a reason sound and honorable:
“For where the chief of [all] priests and the head of the
Christian religion has been established by the heavenly
Emperor, it is not right that there an earthly Emperor should
have jurisdiction.”
O stupid David, stupid Solomon, stupid Hezekiah, Josiah, and all the
other kings, stupid all and irreligious, who persisted in dwelling in
the city of Jerusalem with the chief priests, and did not yield them the
whole city! Constantine in three days is wiser than they could be in
their whole life. And you call [the Pope] a “heavenly Emperor” because
he accepts an earthly empire; unless by that term you mean God (for you
speak ambiguously) and mean that an earthly sovereignty of priests was by
him established over the city of Rome and other places, in which case you
lie.
“We decreed, moreover, that all these things which through this
sacred imperial [charter] and through other godlike decrees we
establish and confirm, remain inviolate and unshaken unto the
end of the world.”
A moment ago, Constantine, you called yourself earthly; now you call
yourself divine and sacred. You relapse into paganism and worse than
paganism. You make yourself God, your words sacred, and your decrees
immortal; for you order the world to keep your commands “inviolate and
unshaken.” Do you consider who you are: just cleansed from the filthiest
mire of wickedness, and scarcely fully cleansed? Why did you not add,
“Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass
from this ‘privilege’”?[495] The kingdom of Saul, chosen by God, did not
pass on to his sons; the kingdom of David was divided under his grandson,
and afterward destroyed. And by your own authority you decree that the
kingdom which you give over without God, shall remain even until the end
of the world! Whoever taught you that the world is to pass away so soon?
For I do not think that at this time you had faith in the poets, who
alone bear witness to this. So you could not have said this, but some one
else passed it off as yours.
However, he who spoke so grandly and loftily, begins to fear, and to
distrust himself, and so takes to entreating:
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account