The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of ConstantineValla, Lorenzo
History
The treatise of Lorenzo Valla on the Donation of Constantine
Valla, Lorenzo
Church and state -- Holy Roman Empire; Constitutum Constantini; Popes -- Temporal power -- Early works to 1800
But oh! the unheard of and incredible thing [that Constantine did]! I
remember asking some one, when I was a youth, who wrote the book of
Job; and when he answered, “Job himself,” I rejoined, “How then would
he mention his own death?” And this can be said of many other books,
discussion of which is not appropriate here. For how, indeed, can that
be narrated which has not yet been done; and how can that which [the
speaker] himself admits was done after the burial, so to say, of the
records, be contained in the records? This is nothing else than saying
that “the page of the privilege” was dead and buried before it was born,
and yet never returned from death and burial; and saying expressly that
it was confirmed before it had been written, and not with one hand
alone at that, but with both of the Caesar’s hands! And what is this
“confirming”? Was it done with the signature of the Caesar, or with
his signet ring? Surely, hard and fast that,—more so by far than if
he had entrusted it to bronze tablets! But there is no need of bronze
inscription, when the charter is laid away above the body of the blessed
Peter. But why do you here suppress Paul, though he lies with Peter, and
the two could guard it better than if the body of one alone were present?
You see the malicious artfulness of the cunning Sinon![499] Because the
Donation of Constantine cannot be produced, therefore he said that the
“privilege” is not on bronze but on paper records; therefore he said that
it lies with the body of the most holy apostle, so that either we should
not dare to seek it in the venerable tomb, or if we should seek it, we
would think it rotted away. But where then was the body of the blessed
Peter? Certainly it was not yet in the temple where it now is, not in a
place reasonably protected and safe. Therefore the Caesar would not have
put the “page” there. Or did he not trust the “page” to the most blessed
Sylvester, as not holy enough, not careful nor diligent enough? O Peter!
O Sylvester! O holy pontiffs of the Roman church! to whom the sheep of
the Lord were entrusted, why did you not keep the “page” entrusted to
you? Why have you suffered it to be eaten by worms, to rot away with
mold? I presume that it was because your bodies also have wasted away.
Constantine therefore acted foolishly. Behold the “page” reduced to dust;
the right conferred by the “privilege” at the same time passes away into
dust.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account