The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and WordsworthReynolds, Myra
History
The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and Wordsworth
Reynolds, Myra
English poetry -- History and criticism; Nature in literature
as but “the spruce impertinence of art.” From them comes no rapture
such as that excited by the “gigantic shapes” of mountains. The Thames
is but a tame stream compared with “old majestic Derwent” forcing his
independent course. In contrast to the grandeur and splendor of Nature
man seems but “weak, contemptible, and vain, the tenant of a day.”
Imperial Ulls-water is not only declared to be superior in charm to
Loch Lomond or Killarney, but it can maintain its own even against
“ought that learned Poussin drew” or anything painted by “dashing
Rosa.” Eighteenth-century praise of scenery could go no farther.
William Blake’s “Poetical Sketches,” published in 1783, were written
between 1769 and 1777.[457] The “Songs of Innocence” appeared in
1788–9; “Book of Thel,” 1789; “The Marriage of Heaven and Hell,” 1790;
and “Songs of Experience” in 1794. In the first volume Nature was the
leading subject; in the next human interests were in the ascendent, and
Nature was used only in fresh, ballad-like touches. In the later work
Nature is slightly used and for the most part in the form of mystical
symbolism.
It was Blake’s theory that man is “imprisoned in his five senses,” and
he counted it his mission to reveal to closed eyes the spiritual as
the only real fact of existence. In his early work this theory, as yet
unexaggerated in application, led to a treatment of Nature, not untrue
to facts, but characterized especially by qualities of simplicity and
vision such as are not found again before Wordsworth. In these years of
his youth Blake was essentially the poet of childhood and spring in all
their sweet, potent, indefinable charm.
And I made a rural pen,
And I stained the water clear
And I wrote my happy songs,
Every child may joy to hear,[458]
gives the keynote to these songs of delight. The joy of Nature is
everywhere insisted on. The sun makes the sky happy; the vales rejoice;
spring cannot hide its joy when buds and blossoms come; the happy
blossoms look on merry birds; groves are happy and green woods rejoice;
dimpling streams, the air, green hills, meadows, and birds laugh with
delight. Here is one exquisite example:
The moon like a flower
In heaven’s high bower,
With silent delight,
Sits and smiles on the night.[459]
He contrasts the clamor and destruction of city streets with the true
joy in Nature. In the silent woods, delights blossom around, numberless
beauties blow. The green grass springs in joy, and the nimble air
kisses the leaves. The brook stretches its arms along the silent
meadow, its silver inhabitants sport and play. The youthful sun joys
like a hunter roused to the chase.[460] In “Fragments” and “Couplets,”
excerpts from his MS book, occurs this fine, though casual statement of
the opposition between town and country:
Great things are done when men and mountains meet;
These are not done by jostling in the street.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account