The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and WordsworthReynolds, Myra
History
The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and Wordsworth
Reynolds, Myra
English poetry -- History and criticism; Nature in literature
I think, with you, that the most magnificent object under heaven
is the great deep; and can not but feel an unpolite species of
astonishment when I consider the multitudes that view it without
emotion, and even without reflection. In all its various forms
it is an object of all others the most suited to affect us with
lasting impressions of the awful power that created and controls
it. I am the less inclined to think this negligence excusable,
because, at a time of life when I gave as little attention to
religious subjects as any man, I yet remember that the waves
would preach to me, and that in the midst of dissipation I had
an ear to hear them. One of Shakespeare’s characters says, “I
am never merry when I hear sweet music.” The same effect that
harmony seems to have had upon him I have experienced from the
sight and sound of the ocean, which have often composed my
thoughts into a melancholy not unpleasing nor without its use.
He had also, during these years at Olney, made many an imaginary
evening journey to remote lands by means of books of travel, of which
he was especially fond. But when he came to write poems, only what he
had known at first hand and with long familiarity occurred to him.
Experiences merely casual, or remote in time, and facts gained from
books slipped away. He remembered only what he habitually saw. The
scenes about Olney he knew, literally, by heart, and of these he wrote.
A characteristic excellence of Cowper’s treatment of Nature is that,
within his narrow circuit, his knowledge is of unusual fulness and
accuracy. The charm of truthful description is everywhere apparent.
In pictures of homely country occupations, such as feeding the
hens,[475] foddering the cattle,[476] cutting wood,[477] plowing,[478]
threshing,[479] there are no false touches, no hasty work. All is
the result of first-hand, leisurely, sympathetic observation. His
description of the garden is from memory, but it almost seems as if he
were walking from flower to flower and taking notes, so minute is the
characterization, so exact each epithet in the representation of the
various colors, forms, odors, and ways of growth of the flowers in this
garden that the poet sees under the snows of winter.[480]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account