The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and Wordsworth — John Shaqi
The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and WordsworthReynolds, Myra
History
The treatment of nature in English poetry between Pope and Wordsworth
Reynolds, Myra
English poetry -- History and criticism; Nature in literature
Rarely in the long period between Waller and Wordsworth do we find
any trace of the modern feeling toward mountains. If they are spoken
of at all it is to indicate the difficulty in surmounting them or to
express the general distaste for anything so savagely and untamably
wild. It is interesting to note that passages expressing the most
active dislike of mountains show really some close observation and a
good deal of picturesque energy of phrase. They were evidently the
outcome of a personal experience, the unpleasantness of which demanded
forcible epithets. They show that when men were compelled by the
exigencies of travel to go into a mountainous region there was not
wanting a perception of certain characteristic mountain qualities, but
that these qualities were only those exciting repulsion and terror.
In no case does a sense of the sublimity and beauty of mountains
find, or even apparently seek, expression. This is true in travels,
fiction, biography, and letters, as well as in poetry. A few typical
illustrations may be given. Howell, who went abroad twice before 1622,
strikes the keynote of the travelers who came later. He distinctly
objected to the “monstrous abruptness” of the “Pyereny Hills” and he
found the Alps even more “high and hideous.” He was obliged to admit
that the Welsh mountains were but mole-hills compared to the Alps, but
he thought the scale more than turned by the fact that those “huge,
monstrous excrescences of nature” were entirely useless, while “Eppint
and Penminmaur” at least furnished grass for the cattle.[33] John
Evelyn regarded the Alps chiefly as an unpleasant barrier between the
“sweete and delicious” gardens of France and the corresponding topiary
paradises of Italy, and his final conception of them is as the place
where Nature swept up the rubbish of the earth to clear the Plains
of Lombardy.[34] Addison was another of these early travelers, and
he, too, found the journey over the Alps most trying. The “irregular,
misshapen scenes” of a mountainous region gave him little pleasure.[35]
He preferred the safe monotony of plains. Both Evelyn and Addison
expended all the descriptive energy they had to spare for mountains
on Vesuvius, but it was, of course, its character as a striking and
curious natural phenomenon that attracted them.[36] Burnet of the
Charter House, the tutor of Lady Mary Pierrepont, in his “Theory of
the Earth” gives a theological reason for the existence of mountains.
He conceives the present world as a gigantic ruin, the result of
sin. Originally the earth was perfectly smooth. “It had the beauty
of youth and blooming nature, fresh and fruitful, and not a wrinkle,
scar, or fracture in all its body; no rocks nor mountains, no hollow
caves, nor gaping channels, but even and uniform all over. And the
smoothness of the earth made the face of the heavens so too; the air
was calm and serene; none of those tumultuary motions and conflicts
of vapours, which the winds cause in ours.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account